Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 F. Supp. 32

In re Medzian

U.S. District Court

Decided July 18, 1932

U.S. District Court · decided 1932-07-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1946

Relies on May v. Henderson · Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz · In re Diamond's Estate

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-07-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

¶1The petition to review is sustained, and the order of the referee is reversed.

¶2I think that under the decisions the trustee is undoubtedly entitled to the summary relief which he seeks; without quoting from or citing many authorities, my view is sustained in Re Diamond’s Estate, 259 F. 70 (C. C. A. 6), which has been cited with approval by the Supreme Court in Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz, 262 U. S. 640, 642, 43 S. Ct. 641, 67 L. Ed. 1151, and May v. Henderson, 268 U. S. 111, 115, 45 S. Ct. 456, 69 L. Ed. 870.

¶3For fees and administration expenses of the state court receiver and his counsel, application must be made to this court sitting in bankruptcy in this proceeding, as in the case of an assignee. Cf. In re Hacker (D. C.) 38 F.(2d) 100.

¶4Further proceedings will be had before the referee in accordance with this decision.

/1/fsupp/32 · .json · Public domain