In re Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 1955
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Hanna · In re Schachter · In re Newbury & Dunham · In re Baldwin · In re Harrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I find that Sam Vitemb was individually engaged in the business of owning and operating a tourist court, known as Midway Courts, and had a gross income of approximately $3,600.00 per month, and approximately $800.00 net per month from September 30, 1952, to date of bankruptcy. “I find that Sam Vitemb failed to keep or preserve books of account or records from September 30, 1952, from which his financial condition and business transactions could be reasonably ascertained. “I find that Sam Vitemb failed to keep individual books or records from which his financial condition and business transactions could be reasonably ascertained. “I find that the failure to keep such books or records was not justified under the circumstances of the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.