Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 FSUPP 53 - Luikhart v. Spurck

Luikhart v. Spurck’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1969
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Hale v. Allinson · Bernheimer v. Converse · Hawkins v. Glenn · William Booth v. Ferdinand Clark · Converse v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the receiver is not a mere chancery receiver, but is a statutory receiver, appointed under a law which specifically authorizes his suing in foreign jurisdictions, or impliedly does so by conferring title to the property sought to be recovered upon the receiver, then he' may, as a matter of right, sue in a foreign jurisdiction.” 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.