Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 F. Supp. 2d 32 - McCreary v. Offner

1 F. Supp. 2d 32 - McCreary v. Offner’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Klein · Loving v. United States · New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Perales · Pennsylvania Medical Society v. Snider

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case of medical assistance furnished under this subchapter for medicare cost-sharing respecting the furnishing of a service or item to a [QMB], the State plan may provide payment in an amount with respect to the service or item that results in the sum of such payment amount . . . exceeding the amount that is otherwise payable under the State plan for the item or service for eligible individuals who are not [QMBs]” (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[0]ne thing is clear: the law regarding state liability to pay for the health services provided to QMBs has never been crystal clear. Section 4714 has certainly provided clarification where it was needed. For this reason, the Court concludes that applying section 4714 retroactively, as Congress directed, is not impermissible under the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.