Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 Ill. 2d 280 - Rose v. Dolejs

1 Ill. 2d 280 - Rose v. Dolejs’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably 195 Ill. App. 3d 976 - Hickox v. Bell (1990), 6 Ill. 2d 365 - Bonde v. Weber (1955)

3 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

1401953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis Award · Holsz v. Stephen · Forest Preserve Real Estate Improvement Corp. v. Miller · Malloy v. City of Chicago · Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, forfeitures are not favored by courts of equity and parties will be protected against them wherever wrong or injustice will result from their enforcement. It is especially well settled that where the agreement is simply one for the payment of money, a forfeiture of land incurred by the nonperformance of the agreement will be set aside on behalf of the defaulting party or relief will be granted in any other manner made necessary by the circumstances of the case, on the payment of the debt, interest and costs, unless complainant has debarred himself by his own conduct. This doctrine is followed when the failure has not been willfull, and where there is a failure to pay taxes. (Dodsworth v. Dodsworth, 254 Ill. 49 ).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.