People v. Lobb’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1995
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 3 Ill. 2d 437 - People v. Morris · 117 Ill. App. 2d 344 - People v. Scott · 118 Ill. App. 2d 189 - People v. Jones · 38 Ill. 2d 316 - The PEOPLE v. Rossolille
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Disparity of sentencing is a serious judicial problem. It can arise when defendants of like background and like prospects for rehabilitation are given unlike and disparate sentences. It can also arise where defendants of substantially different rehabilitation prospects and different backgrounds and different records are given the same sentence.” People v. Lobb, 1 Ill.App.3d 239, 243 , 373 N.E.2d 206 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.