Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Johns. Cas. 102

Spence v. White

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1799

New York Supreme Court · decided 1799-04-15

The plaintiff having recovered less than fifty dollars, the defendant now moved to set off the costs against the sum recovered. -Theattorney for the plaintiff objected, because the whole of his costs were due, and the plaintiff had become insolvent.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1825

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1799-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The objection is not well founded, and th~ rule must be granted.(a)

¶2Rule granted.

¶3а) Porter v. Lane, 8 Johns. R. 357. Wood v. Gibson, 1 Gowen, 597 Graham’s Prac. (2d edit.) 347-349.

/1/johnscas/102 · .json · Public domain