Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Johns. Cas. 28

M'Nealy v. Morison

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1799

New York Supreme Court · decided 1799-01-15

The plaintiff’s attorney received notice from an attorney . for the. defendant, in July ; and in September following, received the like notice from another attorney ; the copy of the declaration was served on the first attorney, but not on the second, and a default entered for want of a plea, which the second attorney now moved to set aside.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1849

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1799-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1It was incumbent on the plaintiff’s attorney, to inform the attorney from whom he received the *second notice of retainer, that he had already a [*29], *32similar notice from another attorney, so as to prevent a surprise. Let the default be set aside, with costs.(a)

¶2Rule granted. ■

¶3 S. C. C. 61.

/1/johnscas/28 · .json · Public domain