1 Kan. App. 2d 683 - Windholz v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2017
4 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Capital Traction Co. v. Hof · 8 Cal. 3d 661 - Brooks v. Small Claims Court · 76 Cal. App. 2d 379 - Prudential Insurance Co. v. Small Claims Court · 49 Cal. 2d 668 - Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The guarantee of trial by jury, like the right to counsel, can be fulfilled if a trial de novo is available at the district court. In Capital Traction Co. v. Hof, 174 U.S. 1 , 43 L.Ed. 873 , 19 S.Ct. 580 (1899), the Court held that the right to a common-law jury trial as guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution is not violated by a statutory provision allowing the primary trial of civil cases of a moderate amount by a justice of the peace, where the statute also allowed the parties the right to appeal to a court of record where a common-law jury could be had. The Minnesota Supreme Court applied the same reasoning to uphold a statute establishing a "conciliation court” where the losing party could appeal and get a trial by jury. Flour City Fuel and Transfer Co. v. Young, 150 Minn. 452 , 185 N.W. 934 (1921).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is dissatisfied with the judgment of the small claims court he has a right of appeal to the superior court where he is entitled to a trial de novo”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he exclusion of counsel from the small claims proceeding is not fatal where a trial de novo with counsel is available”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.