Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 387

Rogal v. Mullen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1880

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1880-07-01

Rogers, J. The plaintiff, with the consent of the defendant took executory process to foreclose a mortgage without producing the note, alleging that it had been lost or stolen. Mrs. Glaser injoined on the ground that she held and owned the note, and had acquired it in due course of business before maturity. The plaintiff had handed the note to his daughter; who was the divorced wife of the defendant, for her to raise money or to pay the expenses of her divorce suit.

Decided 1880-07-01

Spencer, J.

¶1Here Is a clear admission that he had let her have the note. She borrowed money on it, and he is bound by her act. His allegation that the note was lost or stolen is manifestly false. The judge below did not believe him, nor do we.

¶2Judgment affirmed,.

/1/mannunrepcas/387 · .json · Public domain