Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 Md. App. 178 - Avey v. State

1 Md. App. 178 - Avey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

37 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Williams v. Zuckert · Giles v. State · Simler v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial court found that the arrest did not occur until after Avey had voluntarily gone to the Air Police Operations Office and voluntarily gone to the Prince George’s County Hospital for treatment. There is ample evidence to support the finding. After the bullet wounds were observed, no one could contend that the officers lacked reasonable grounds to believe a felony had been committed and that Avey was the felon. We hold that after Detective Ross observed the hole in the left glove and remembered that Avey had held his hand between his knees enroute to the Air Police Operations Office, there was ample grounds for an arrest at any time thereafter, if not before, McChan v. State, 238 Md. 149 , 207 A. 2d 632 ; Hewitt v. State, 242 Md. 111 , 218 A. 2d 19 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Now, as to the assault with intent to murder and with the intent to maim, I instruct you in an advisory capacity that you may properly consider the state of mind of the defendant at the time of the shooting. I say that because of the type of evidence that has been introduced in this case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““This Court has stated that the trial court is in an advantageous position to judge the question of prejudice and its decision with reference thereto should not be reversed unless it is clear that there was prejudice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.