Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 Md. App. 540 - Musgrove v. State

1 Md. App. 540 - Musgrove v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 1985

2 district · 17 state decisions

160196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. United States · United States v. Lefkowitz · Taglavore v. United States · Royal v. State · Cornish v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The principle of law that an arrest may not be used as a pretext to search for evidence is undoubtedly sound. Fundamental principles of law, however, are oft-times easier to state than to apply. It is apparent that the applicability of this principle must be determined in the light of the facts and circumstances of each particular case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.