1 Md. App. 548 - Grayson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1999
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Swain v. State of Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Unless the absence of Negroes from a jury panel is proven by competent evidence to be by purposeful discrimination or design, appellant’s bald assertion that he had been denied a fair and impartial trial will not be sustained. See Giles v. State, 229 Md. 370 , 183 A. 2d 359 (1961); Jackson v. State, 180 Md. 658 , 26 A. 2d 815 (1942); Zimmerman v. State, 191 Md. 7 , 59 A. 2d 675 (1948); aff’d 336 U. S. 901 (1949); U. S. ex rel. Jackson v. Brady, 133 F. 2d 476 (4th Cir. 1943), cert. den. 319 U. S. 746 (1943), reh. den. 319 U.S. 784 (1943); Swain v. Alabama, 380 U. S. 202 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 759 , 85 S. Ct. 824 (1965).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.