1 Mich. 115
Decided January 15, 1848
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1848-01-15
Mr. Douglass moved .to strike a bill of exceptions from the record. The affidavits he proposed reading in support of his motion, were entitled, “ Gardner D. Williams ads. Charles W. Whipple and Theodore Romeyh.” Mr. Davidson^on the part of the plaintiff, objected to the reading of the affidavits, as they were not entitled in the cause. 4 Hill 19.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1876
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1848-01-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Affidavits must be correctly entitled in the cause in which they are to be used; otherwise an indictment for perjury would not lie upon them, if false. 2 Cowen 509. Notices and other papers are sufficient if they do not mislead. Since the severance there is no, such cause in this court as that in which the affidavits are entitled.
¶2Motion denied.