1 Mich. N.P. 172
Circuit Court of the 19th Circuit of Michigan
Decided December 15, 1869
Circuit Court of the 19th Circuit of Michigan · decided 1869-12-15
<p>Millmorb had suits pending in different courts, on call about the same time. His presence at both places appeared necessary. On motion, held that the cause last noticed for trial should be continued.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1924
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1869-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1By the Court,
¶2The defendant in this case, is also defenda nt in a case pending in the U. S. District Court, for the District of Wisconsin. The cases in the two courts are on call for about the same time. The defendant’s affidavit for a continuance, shows that his presence and testimony is necessary on the trial in both courts.
¶3He is bound by the first notice of trial served, and the first notice having come from th#e H. S. Court, that is sufficient grounds for a continuance in this court.