Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Miss. 152

Spain v. Winter

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1824

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1824-06-15

<p>It is error t° refuse t° clrnnge the venue, when thedefendantmakes oath that lio is a resident freeholder ot a differenteounty from that in which the action is instituted,</p> <p>llie opinion m the case ofLevi Kendricks, administrator, vs. William Snodgrass, affirmed.</p>

Decided 1824-06-15

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT — bv the

Hon. POWHATTAN ELLIS,

¶2This was an action of trespass on the case, on a promissory note, executed by Spain to the defendant, payable three days after date. When *153this case was called at the May term, 1822, of the superior court of Adams county — the defendant below submitted the following affidavit:

¶3STATE OF MISSISSIPPI,) Adams County, s. s. )

¶4Personally appeared hefore the undersigned justice of the peace for said county, Richard Spain, and made oath, that he is a resident and freeholder of the county of Jefferson, and State of Mississippi, and not a freeholder and resident of Adams county, and State aforesaid.

¶5RICHARD SPAIN.

¶6Sworn and subscribed, this 18th day of March, 1822, before

¶7H. TOOLY, justice of the peace.

¶8'and moved the court to change-the venue to Jefferson county, which motion was overruled, and judgement entered for the plaintiff for the amount of the note, interest and costs. To this judgment there was a writ of error sued out, returnable into this court.

¶9Assignment on Eraioits.

¶10First, That the court overruled the motion to change the same.

¶11Second, The court gave judgment for the plaintiff, without ruling defendant to plead, or in any manner hearing his defence to the action.

¶12Third, That no judgment by default was taken, or writ of enquiry awarded.

¶13The court below erred in overruling the motion to change the venue.— See Revised Code, page 67 — section 16.

¶14Upon the rule recognized in the case of Levi Kendricks, administrator, vs. William Snodgrass, delivered at the January term, 1822, the judgment iii this case must be reversed. In that case, it appeared from the record, that no plea had been filed, or judgment by default taken, upon which the .judgment of the court was rendered, prerequisites absolutely necessary to ■authorize the court to render judgment against the defendant below.

¶15Judgment of the court below reversed, and venire facias deaovo •awarded.

/1/miss/152 · .json · Public domain