Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Mo. 394

Childers v. Goza

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 15, 1823

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1823-11-15

<p>An executor cannot prosecute a writ of error on a judgment obtained in the life time of the testator, unless the death of the testator he suggested of record.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1958

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1823-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

M’Girk, C. J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶2This was an action of replevin, to recover a slave. Plea, property in the defendant ; verdict and judgment for the defendant. This writ of error was brought by Joel Childers, the plaintiff in the Court below. There is no suggestion of the death of the plaintiff, and yet the assignment of errors is by a person styling himself executor. Regularly, this suit is abated, if Joel Childers is dead, as it has not been revived by his representative. The law is, where errors are not assigned in due time, the Court shall affirm or dismiss. The assignment in this case is, as if no assignment had been made. We have carefully examined the record, to see if we can affirm the judgment. We are of opinion, there is no error in the record, and

¶3Judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

/1/mo/394 · .json · Public domain