¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2Henks sued Debertshauser, before a justice of the peace, ■'for the recovery of a horse alleged to be worth $75, and $50 for detention of it. There was judgment for Henks before "the justice, and again on appeal in the Circuit Court, whence Debertshauser appealed to this court.
¶3Appellant makes several points on which he relies for a reversal of the judgment, one of which goes to the jurisdiction of the justice.
¶4This was an action for the recovery of specific personal ■property. The jurisdiction of a justice of the peace is declared (Wag. Stat., sec. 3, p. 808) to be concurrent with the Circuit Court in ‘ ‘ all actions for the recovery of specific personal property, not exceeding the value of $100, alleged ■to be wrongfully detained, and damages for injuries thereto, •or for the taking and detention, or detention thereof, not •exceeding $25.”
¶5Inasmuch as jurisdiction is “ the right to hear and determine a cause” (United States v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 691-709, for the remark of Judge Baldwin), and, consequently j it is the claim as presented, not the claim as decided or Allowed, which is the measure of the power of the court, it follows that the justice had no jurisdiction of the cause which is brought before us on appeal. This ruling renders All other examination of the record unnecessary. The judgment of the Circuit: Court is reversed,