Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Morr. St. Cas. 637

Pace v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1872-07-01

<p>FORFEITURE OF RECOGNIZANCE.</p> <p>A recognizance is an obligation of record entered into before a court or officer duly authorized for that purpose with condition to do some act required by law.</p> <p>The sheriff is only authorized to take a recognizance from a person whom he may arrest on the process of a circuit court of law, charged before such court with any crime or misdemeanor, not punishable with death.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1872-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1910

3 state decisions

1018721880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Bishee, J.:

¶1This was a writ of error to the judgment of the circuit court of Newton county, rendered upon a scire facias against the plaintiff in error, as bail for one George TV. Buchanan.

¶2The question for decision is, whether the obligation upon which the judgment was rendered, is a bond or recognizance ; and if a bond, whether a forfeiture could be taken and judgment rendered thereon, as in the case of a recognizance.

¶3A recognizance is an obligation of record entered into before a court or an officer duly authorized for that purpose, with condition to do some act required by law. 2 Bl. Com., 341; 2 Bou. Law. Dic., 413. The instrument in the record under this authority, cannot be treated as a recognizance, but only as a bond.

¶4The principal, Buchanan, was admitted to bail by Judge Dawson, in the sum of two thousand dollars, with four securities in the sum of five hundred dollars each. The bond in question was not taken or approved by the judge making the order for bail; but by the sheriff, who clearly had no authority under the statute to take even a recognizance. He is only authorized to take a recognizance from a person whom he may arrest on the process of a circuit court of law, charged before such court with any crime or misdemeanor, not punishable with death. Hutch. Code, p. 444, § 13.

¶5Under the authorities, we are of opinion, that the court below erred in overruling the demurrer to the scire facias, and rendering judgment against the plaintiff in error.

¶6Judgment reversed, and judgment final on the demurrer for the plaintiff in error.

/1/morrstcas/637 · .json · Public domain