1 N.C. 172
Decided July 1, 1793
ONE promised Rutland Mollineux thatin consideration of &c. he would make assurance of certain lands, which he refused to do. And Mollineux sued him in the court of requests for a special performance. In order to obtain a prohibition he alledged. 1. That the plaintiff has an action on the case at common law. To which it was answered that in it, he would only recover damages, but here the suit is for a specific performance, to obtain which there is no action at common law.
Decided 1793-07-01
¶1Yet we will not suffer the Court of Requests to go on, though the Chancery may.
¶22. It appears by the bill that the plaintiff is a recusant convict, who by the statute, is an excommunicated person, and therefore cannot sue.
¶3The defendant has admitted the plaintiff to be able to sue.
¶4*173The court refused the prohibition.
¶5Doderidge, J. The court will do justice to a recusant convict. Noy 88.