Public-domain · open source

1 N.C. 35

Strudwick v. . Shaw

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1791

Superior Court of North Carolina · decided 1791-10-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1799

1 state decisions

Relies on Den Ex Dem. Dobson v. Murphy · John Den on Dem. Rogers v. Mabe · Greenlee v. Young

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1791-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1NOTE. — See this case reported in 2 N.C. 5. Also see Blair v.Miller, 13 N.C. 407; Green v. Harman, 15 N.C. 158; Burton v. Carruth,18 N.C. 2; Carson v. Burnett, ibid., 546; Pickett v. Pickett, 14 N.C. 6;Hoke v. Henderson, ibid., 12; Rogers v. Mabe, 15 N.C. 180; Dobson v.Murphy, 18 N.C. 586; Dobson v. Erwin, 20 N.C. 201; Murray v. Shanklin,ibid., 289; Ross v. Durham, ibid., 54; Tredwell v. Reddick, 23 N.C. 56;Flanniken v. Lee, ibid., 293; Williams v. Buchanan, ibid., 535. *44

¶2(36)

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Case posture

Posture: The land in dispute was granted to A. in 1728, who sold to B. in 1730, and B. some time afterwards went to England. B. sold to C., who came to Carolina, where he remained till 1787, when he brought suit. One D. settled on the land in 1751, lived upon it thirteen years, and died in possession, leaving a son. The son assigned to some person, who assigned to the defendant, who had lately procured a grant. Under these circumstance it was held that the plaintiff's jus possessionis was lost.

Source: CourtListener

Court

Superior Court of North Carolina