Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 N.C. 369

State v. Hendricks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1802

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1802-06-15

The defendant was indicted for horse-stealing in Salisbury Superior Court of Law, March Term, 1802.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1927

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1802-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court—

¶1The fact is charged to be committed on the 30th day of November, in the 25th year of the Independence of the State, and in the year of our Lord, 1801, which is in the 26th year of independence ; therefore charged to have been committed in two different years; which is contradictory, and vitiates the indictment.

¶2No indictment can be good without precisely shewing a certain year and day, of the material facts alledged in it. 2 Hawk. P. C. 235. It is certain that if the indictment lays the offence on an uncertain or impossible day, as where it lays it on a future day, or lays one and the same offence at different days, &c. it will be held bad. Ibid. This is expressly the case in question. The offence is charged to have been committed on the same month in two different years, which *370is impossible. We are therefore of opinion, that the judgment should be arrested.

/1/nc/369 · .json · Public domain