¶1It ivas held
¶2that an action will not lie on a covenant of warranty, until there has been an eviction, or some disturbance or hindrance in the enjoyment, which, in law, may be equivalent to an eviction.
¶3Verdict for the defendant.
1 N. Chip. 35
Rich v. Wait
Decided September 15, 1790
Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1790-09-15
<p>to support an ““^ranty there mUSev^ofaon,°or banca taxa-</p>
Decided 1790-09-15