Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2021
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mutual Life Ins Co of New York v. Hillmon · Petrocelli v. State · Hutchins v. State · Lisle v. State · Goldsmith v. Sheriff of Lyon County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he statutory test for determining the admissibility of statements against penal interest under NRS 51.345 is whether the totality of the circumstances indicates the trustworthiness of the statement or corroborates the notion that the statement was not fabricated to exculpate the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[fit is well-settled that a statement against interest made to a close friend or relative is considered to be more reliable than a statement made to a stranger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coleman v. State“alternat five] theories of liability as long as there is evidence in support of those theories.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.