Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 NJL 77 - Coryell v. Colbaugh

Coryell v. Colbaugh’s Empirical Analysis

1791

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023

1 district · 6 state decisions

40179118001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “damages for example's sake, to prevent such offences in future”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “of the most atrocious and dishonourable nature”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.