Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 N.M. Ct. App. 600 - State v. Ballard

1 N.M. Ct. App. 600 - State v. Ballard’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Jacobsen · Swafford v. State · State v. Bernal · Herron v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unlawful for a person to intentionally possess any obscene visual or print medium depicting any prohibited sexual act or simulation of such an act if that person knows or has reason to know that the obscene medium depicts any prohibited sexual act or simulation of such act and if that person knows or has reason to know that one or more of the participants in that act is a child under eighteen years of age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.