Carney v. Philippone’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2011
most recently cited
6 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to give effect to the phrase ` and not thereafter ' in section 8 [of the Onondaga County Tax Act], the six-month notice requirement cannot lengthen the two- and three-year redemption periods.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carney v. Philippone“[a]n owner's right to redeem is limited to two years. Eighteen months into that period, a tax sale purchaser — before it can request a deed for the property — must give notice to the owner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carney v. Philippone“an owner should be held to the two-year period to redeem property, whether or not that person is also an occupant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carney v. Philippone
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.