Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 N.Y.3d 333 - Carney v. Philippone

Carney v. Philippone’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in order to give effect to the phrase ` and not thereafter ' in section 8 [of the Onondaga County Tax Act], the six-month notice requirement cannot lengthen the two- and three-year redemption periods.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n owner's right to redeem is limited to two years. Eighteen months into that period, a tax sale purchaser — before it can request a deed for the property — must give notice to the owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an owner should be held to the two-year period to redeem property, whether or not that person is also an occupant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.