¶1The charge of the court was explicit and complete. It presented all the questions to the jury in a manner of which defendant had no ground to complain. The verdict was entirely justified by the evidence. Probably any other verdict would have been set aside as against evidence. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
1 N.Y.S. 347
Higgins v. Graul
Decided May 14, 1888
New York Supreme Court · decided 1888-05-14
Barnard, Justice, Beplevin by John Higgins against John' Graul for certain described chattels, or the value thereof. Plaintiff had given to defendant a bill of sale of the property, assigning as a reason: “I gave it to hinr to hold until I could pay up every debt I owed in the world.” He further testified that he received no consideration for the same.
Decided 1888-05-14