← 1 Ohio App. 3d 156 - State v. Williams

1 Ohio App. 3d 156 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

cited by 27 later decisions

states following

February 2026

most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 51 Ohio App. 3d 31 - State v. Strobel (1988), 110 Ohio App. 3d 749 - State v. Reed (1996)

27 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rideout v. United States · State v. Roberts · Pryor v. Webber · 51 Ohio App. 2d 132 - State v. Owens · Braxton v. Maxwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“' "either affirmatively demonstrate before trial that his rights would be prejudiced by the joinder, or to show at the close of the state's case, or at the conclusion of all the evidence, that his rights actually had been prejudiced by the joinder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Corker · State v. Jamea
“clearly probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Brewster · State v. Whites Landing Fisheries, L.L.C.
“[U]nder Evid.R. 608(B), the ability of trial counsel to discredit a witness through cross-examination concerning particular conduct of the witness is not absolute; it is limited in its exercise to the court's sound discretion in determining if the inquiry will lead to particular instances of conduct which are clearly probative of untruthfulness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Whites Landing Fisheries, L.L.C.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.