1 Ohio Law. Abs.
Volume 1 — Ohio Law Abstracts
1,111 opinions
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 5Bloch v. Eastern Mach. Screw Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 5Katz v. United States (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 7Trapp v. B. & O. Ry. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 7United States v. Guthrie (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 9Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 9Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 9Citizens Mortgage Loan Co. v. Carrel (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 10Bello v. City of Cleveland (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of- Appeals qf Cuyahoga county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 10Beebe v. State ex rel. Starr Piano Co. (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 10State ex rel. Trumbull Steel Co. v. Industrial Commission (1922)
<p>In Prohibition.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 10State ex rel. Sheppard v. Magnet (1922)
<p>In Quo Warranto.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 10Akron & Barberton Belt R. R. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
<p>Error to the Public Utilities Commission.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 10Ex parte Martha Co. (1922)
<p>Habeas Corpus.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 11Wheatcraft v. Hall (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Miami County (On rehearing)</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 12State v. Huwe (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 12Hancock Co. v. Mooreman (1922)
<p>No. 29</p> <p>SCHOOLS — (1) Board of Education may either “rebuild,” “repair” or both, or “construct” new buildings — -Issue of Bonds.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 12State v. Railroads (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 13Levine v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 13Cincinnati (City) v. Roettinger (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 13Cincinnati Un. Depot Co. v. Cincinnati (City) (1922)
<p>No. 33</p> <p>MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — Deposit to secure franchise performance — (1) Return of after revocation of ordinanhe, not a gift — (2) Rights under franchise and revoking- ordinance construed.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 15Sawyer v. Bing Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 15Biggs-Watterson Co. v. Sauer (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 15National Bank v. Fuerst (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 20Berner v. Wellbaum (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 20Busch v. Wilgus (1922)
<p>No. 38</p> <p>RIPARIAN RIGHTS — Orchard Island owners of lots fronting on Indian Lake, run to low water mark— Injunction lies, against lessees from State, who try to occupy for private use — Easement implied.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 37Glenberg v. United States (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 37Presont v. United States (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 38Chestowsky v. Wolf Run Coal Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 38Heppel v. City of Columbus (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 38Hueseman v. Fingermeyer (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 38McBride v. White Motor Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 38State v. Habig (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 38Olshevsky v. Wolf Run Coal Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 39Heppel v. City of Columbus (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 39State v. Habig (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 39Huseman v. Fingermeyer (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 39Ohio Mining Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
<p>Error to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 40Hauck v. State (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Warren county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 40State ex rel. Turner v. Fender (1922)
<p>In Quo Warranto.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 40Cleveland & Eastern Traction Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
<p>Error to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 40State ex rel. Maxwell v. Wilson (1922)
<p>In Quo Warranto.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 41Lambert v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 43Shanker v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 43Cleveland Railway Co. v. Evans (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 43Kudla v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 44Traction & Light Co. v. Wheaton (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 44Gottlieb v. Union Trust Co. (1922)
<p>No. 58</p> <p>BANKS & BANKING — (1) Certification of check Equivalent to Payment — Drawer cannot revoke a certified check.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 44Legan v. Am. Agrl. Chemical Co. (1922)
<p>No. 59</p> <p>NEGLIGENCE — Unlighted stairway, injury in falling down.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 44Yarus v. Cleveland Ry. Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 45Continental Realty Co. v. Katz (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 46N. Y. Cent. Securities Corp. v. C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 46Jones v. Gross (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 49Cleveland & W. Coal Co. v. Balt. & O. R. R. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 52Feldcamp v. Cincinnati Trac. Co. (1922)
<p>No. 66</p> <p>EVIDENCE — Inherent power of court to appoint experts to make examination of litigants and advise concerning merits of claims.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 52Barcus v. Howard (1922)
<p>No. 65</p> <p>WILLS — (1) Creation of a trust estate — (2) Subsequent deed did not revoke the trust provision of will — Remainders engrafted on a fee — (3) Intention of testator governs construction.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 68Selway v. Fourth National Bank (1922)
<p>No. 69</p> <p>APPEALS — (1) Circuit Court may extend time for making return, where appellant not negligent— (2) Amendment of narration proper practice.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 69Ayulo v. Mullen (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Williams v. Lewis (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Cleveland & Eastern Traction Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Houck v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Keifer v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Perkins v. Industrial Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Seaman v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Shelton v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Solkovitch v. Dorfman (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70State ex rel. Grant v. Joint Board of County Commissioners (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70State ex rel. Maxwell v. Wilson (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70State ex rel. Turner v. Fender (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Stockum v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Tax Commission ex rel. Price v. Lamprecht (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Valentine v. Canada Life Assurance Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Van Wert Gas Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70White v. Snodgrass (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Wooster Electric Co. v. Burket (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70West v. Lucas (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 70Esenwein v. Fratiani (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 71Shelton v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 71Seaman v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co. v. Hade (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of Cleveland (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Nigro v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Board of Education v. McHenry (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Columbus Packing Co. v. State ex rel. Schlesinger (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Kemeny v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Simpson v. Holmes (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73State ex rel. Shafer v. Otter (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Hooper v. Nicholas (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Jones v. Erie Railroad (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Meyer v. Packard Cleveland Motor Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73State v. Vonderhaar (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Aldrich v. City of Youngstown (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Asztalos v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Nagy v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73President of Harvard College v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Rosanski v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Schciller v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Schendel v. Bradford (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Schulte v. Johnson (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Sloneker v. Van Ausdall (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Stravinsky v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Szo v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Village of Oak Harbor v. Oak Harbor Natural Gas Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Waldron v. New York Central Railway Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 73Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Davis (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 75Kilby Man. Co. v. Molders' Union (1922)
<p>No. 72</p> <p>INJUNCTION — Restraining. Strikers! from inter-ferring with employees — (2) Picketing must be peaceable — (3) Lawful use of pickets not enjoined.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 75Schneider v. State (1922)
<p>Error from Court of Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 75Demertges v. Huttas (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 75Thompson v. Stuyvesant Motor Co. (1922)
<p>No. 71</p> <p>LEASE — (1) Remedy — Agency, proof of — Testimony not showing authority to execute, excluded—</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 76White v. White (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 76Davis v. Diedrich (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 76White v. Snodgrass (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 76Allison v. Cornell (1922)
<p>Error to Franklin County Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 77Gary Cement & Paint Co. v. Stern (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 77President of Harvard College v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 84State ex rel. Connor v. Noctor (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 84Simpson v. Holmes (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 100Midland Linseed Products Co. v. Sargent Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102State ex rel. Price v. Cleveland-Columbus Realty Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102City of Lima v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102City of Portsmouth v. Nicola Building Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102City of Youngstown v. First National Bank (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Cornwell v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102John H. McGowan Co. v. City of Portsmouth (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Ohio River & Western Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Ohio v. Corwin (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Rutledge v. State Medical Board (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Sanborn v. Sanborn (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102State ex rel. Coss v. Forney (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102State ex rel. Lueders v. Beaman (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102State ex rel. Price v. Lueders (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Zajachuck v. Willard Storage Battery Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Citizens Savings & Trust Co. v. Cincinnati & Dayton Traction Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co. v. Hade (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 102State ex rel. Eavey v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 103Columbus Packing Co. v. State ex rel. Schlessinger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 103Hopper v. Nicholas (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 103Schulte v. Johnson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 103State ex rel. Shafer v. Otter (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 104Rosanski v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 104Jones v. Erie Railroad (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 105Waldron v. New York Central Railway Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 105City of Portsmouth v. Nicola Building Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 105Schendel v. Bradford (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 105Bellaire (City) v. Ferry Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107Wheeler v. Nims (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107Frazier v. Scott (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107Richards v. Schueler (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 107Brozich v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 108Harbine v. Winslow (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 108Thomas v. Abell (1922)
<p>No. 98</p> <p>CONTRACTS — Joint or several — (1) Burden of proof on plaintiff to show — (2) Substantiate justice — not done by affirming a joint judgment-that might have been several.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 132Biskind v. United States (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 132Ormsby v. Finney (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 133Horst v. United States (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134State v. Corwin (1922)
<p>On Exceptions of the Prosecuting Attorney of Seneca County, Ohio.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134City of Youngstown v. First National Bank (1922)
<p>MUNICIPAL OFFICERS — (1) Police officers for temporary service — (2) Compensation, for — (3) Burns law not applicable to emergencies — (4) Sub-rogation of bank to right of emergency patrolmen it has paid to recover from municipality.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134Sloneker v. Van Ausdall (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Butler county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134Sanborn v. Sanborn (1922)
<p>ESTOPPEL — Erroneous judgment not appealed from — payment of part — Estoppel to claim invalidity of other part of the judgment without restoration of sum paid.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 135John H. McGowan Co. v. City of Portsmouth (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Scioto county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 135Citizens Savings & Trust Co. v. Cincinnati & Dayton Traction Co. (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 136Rutledge v. State Medical Board (1922)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Wood county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 136United States v. Remus (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 136City Railway Co. v. Beard (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 139Kelley v. Davies (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 139Funk v. Heffner (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 139State v. Beck (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 140Ferro Machine & Foundry Co. v. Willson Ave. Lumber Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 140Wooster Electric Co. v. Burkett (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 162General Invest. Co. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 163Tug Line v. Steamship Line, L. (1922)
<p>No. 109</p> <p>TOWAGE — (1) Responsibility for movement — (2) Presumption of receipt of letter — (3) Addressee’s error — (4) Express assent to tariff — (5) Contract limit of liability.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 163Dayton Bronze Bearing Co. v. Gilligan (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 164Wong Sun v. Fluckey (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 165State ex rel. Copeland v. State Medical Board (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 167Murray v. Brown-Graves Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 167Auto Truck Co. v. Wakeman (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 167Dorris v. High Grove Park Land Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 167State v. Campbell (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 168Beck v. Cuyahoga Falls (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 168Superior Baking Co. v. Krumeich (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 168Frederick v. W. & L. E. Ry. Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 168Davis v. Strand Theatre Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 169Katz v. Deutsch (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 169McManness v. Pilliod (1923)
<p>Appeal from Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 169Hornyak v. Brick Co. (1923)
<p>No. 121</p> <p>DAMAGES — Injury from shooting by a watchman— Not proven to be within scope of duties — Nor done with intent.</p> <p>This opinion has not been published elsewhere.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 169Uniontown Estates Co. v. Heckman (1922)
<p>No. 123</p> <p>MISJOINDER OF ACTIONS — (1) Allegations that defendants combined for purpose of fraud, sufficient to charge conspiracy — (2) Allegations that several of a number of defendants knew of fraud and acted with such knowledge includes such persons as defendants — (3) Allegations that one of several defendants knew of fraud makes such •person proper party to the action — (4) No mis-joinder of actions when all defendants are shown to be proper parties.</p> <p>This opinion has not been published elsewhere.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 170National City Bank v. Camp (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 179Fleischman Construction Co. v. Burns (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 180McClean v. Bradley (1922)
<p>No. 129</p> <p>CORPORATIONS — (1) Defunct corporation noi necessary party — (2) Stock allotment on reorganization immaterial — (3) Chattel mortgagf voidable — (4) Proxy ratification — (5) Laches— (6) State limitation — (7) Burden of proof — (8) Adequacy of consideration — (9) Directors noi trustees — (10) Setting aside sale made on mortgage — (11) Directors may buy — (12) Good faitf — (13-17) Adequate consideration.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Meeker v. Scudder (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Ricard v. Howe (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Smythe v. Epdtein (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181State ex rel. Levy v. Taylor (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Adams v. Hollow Rock Mining & Transportation Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Bennett v. Fleming (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Cincinnati Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181In re the vacation of Indianola avenue (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181James v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181LaFrance Electrical Construction & Supply Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 8 (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181McMerriman v. Scheil (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181National Automatic Typewriter Co. v. Hoover Automatic Typewriter Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Pullman Co. v. Automobile Insurance Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Seibert v. Seibert (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Tesca v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Thompson v. Haswell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181Village of Vinton v. James (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181City of Wellsville v. Steubenville, East Liverpool & Beaver Valley Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 183Dennis v. Coble (1923)
<p>Error to Lucas Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 183Detroit & T. S. L. Rd. v. Taloff (1923)
<p>Error to Lucas Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 183Woloveck v. Taylor (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 184Rojek v. Kuskowski (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 184Birinyi v. Ridarcsik (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 184Fernandez v. Traction Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 185Roberts v. Third National Exchange Bank (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 185Columbia Chemical Co. v. Emmons (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 195Grable v. Killits (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 195United States v. L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of County Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Board of County Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197Doepke v. Alms (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197Oschsner v. Cincinnati Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197Tomko v. Standard Oil Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 197State v. Englehart ex rel. Englehart (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 199Buddenberg v. Lisle (1923)
<p>No. 143</p> <p>This Opinion Has Been Published in The Abstract Only</p> <p>AUTOMOBILE — (1) Negligence in driving — (1) Blinding headlights; duty to stop — (2) Parking without lights.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 199Green v. Miller (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 199Jennings v. Jennings (1923)
<p>Error to Common Pleas Court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 200Tank v. Cousino (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 200Columbia Chemical Co. v. Emmons (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 200American Engineering v. International Steel Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 201Cleveland Railway Co. v. Arter (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 201Empire Plow Co. v. Fishel (1923)
<p>No. 150</p> <p>Exclusive Publication of This Opinion Can Be Found in The Abstract</p> <p>WARRANTY — Measure of damages for breach of (1) Effect of General Verdict — (2) Erroneous instruction as to one issue.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 201Siddall v. McNary (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 202Shedd Creamery Co. v. Dorf (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 202Marquard v. Moore (1923)
<p>Error to Common Pleas Court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 202Nimberger v. State (1923)
<p>Error to Common Pleas Court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 202Clark v. Salberg (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 210Thomas-Bonner Co. v. Hooven, Owens & Rentschler Co. (1920)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 211Rings v. Barton (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 211State v. Auerbach (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 211Hackett v. Northall (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 211Montanari v. Haworth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 211Schueler v. Richards (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 212Ochsner v. Cincinnati Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 213State ex rel. Eavey v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 213London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Board of County Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 213Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 217Mylyn v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 217When Store Co. v. White (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 217Picking v. Equity Realty Co. (1923)
<p>No. 165</p> <p>MORTGAGE — (1) Installments — Exercise of privilege of maturing all upon default — (2) Tender unavailable — (3) Inability to locate mortgagee, ground for- relief.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 218Lautz v. Moss (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 218DeRoberts v. Miles Heating Co. (1923)
<p>Error to Cleveland Municipal Court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 218State v. Szilogya (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 218Blusinsky v. Mulholland (1923)
<p>Error to Cleveland Municipal Court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 219Cleveland Railway Co. v. Bell (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 219Pfeil v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 219City of East Cleveland v. Free (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 219Cleveland Railway Co. v. Selzer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 220Pomeransky v. State (1923)
<p>Error to Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 220Putka v. Bankers Commercial Securities Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 220Feyses v. Hajek (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 220State v. Patterson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 221First State Bank v. Foote Lumber Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 221Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Mills (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 228Cleveland Baptist Ass'n v. Scovil (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 229Lemieux v. Kounutz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 229Cochran v. State (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 233Ramseyer v. Sheehan (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 233Flick v. Paragon Refining Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 233Ule v. Rockwell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 234Seufser v. Busse (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 234Pfeil v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 234Klonowski v. Monczewski (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 234Rosansky v. Rosansky (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 235Doebel v. Curmayn (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 235Lotow v. May Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 235Levine v. Feldman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 235National Mortgage Corp. v. Adams (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 242Knight v. Milner (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 244State v. Chandler (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 249Heck v. Ainsworth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 249Cytlak v. Cleveland Railway Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 249Atlantic Machine & Mfg. Co. v. Nizinski (1923)
<p>Error to Municipal Court of Cleveland</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 250Blackett v. Guardian Savings & Trust Co. (1923)
<p>Error to Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 250Smythe v. Epstein (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 250Bramson v. Cleveland Stone Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 251Cleveland (City) v. Kelly (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 251Black v. East Cleveland (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 251Builders Supply & Fuel Co. v. Huntington & Fink Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259Logan v. Cleveland Railway Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259McMurtrie v. Wheeling Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259Reutener v. City of Cleveland (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259United Fuel Gas Co. v. City of Ironton (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259Sobolovitz v. Lubric Oil Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259Hile v. City of Cleveland (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 259Loomis v. Toledo Railways & Light Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 260City of Cincinnati v. Cook (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 260Barth v. State ex rel. Zielonka (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 261McMurtrie v. Wheeling Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 261Loomis v. Toledo Railways & Light Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 261Sobolovitz v. Lubric Oil Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 261Hile v. City of Cleveland (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 261Logan v. Cleveland Railway Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 262Reutner v. City of Cleveland (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 265National Bank of Commerce v. Wienetsky (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 265Sibold v. Green (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 265Broadway v. Lucas County Agricultural Society (1923)
<p>216</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>LIABILITY FOR ANIMALS — (l)Averment in petition of knowledge of all conditions and dangers includes averment of knowledge of particular danger — (2) Owner of domestic animal liable for injury caused by animal only when he knows of its vicious propensity — (3) Person not the owner or keeper of domestic animal cannot be held liable for injuries caused by it.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 266Wnek v. State (1923)
<p>221</p> <p>This opinion lias not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>SEARCH WARRANT — (1) Unlawful issue — Signed by Clerk of Court — EVIDENCE—-(2) Intoxicating liquor, evidence of smell of and appearance.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 266Fisher Bros. v. Mormino (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 266Goldfarb v. State (1923)
<p>No. 222</p> <p>Tliis opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>INDICTMENT — Variance in Proof — Jewelry not cash.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 266Spies v. Society for Savings (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 267Burden v. State (1923)
<p>223</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>ORDINANCE — (1) Conflict with State Statute— Method of determination — (2) Construction of apparently conflicting laws.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 267Erie R. R. v. Stewart Furnace Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 267Huntington & Finke Co. v. Lake Erie Lumber Co. (1923)
<p>225</p> <p>This opinion ihas not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>CONTRACTS — (1) Rescission.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 268Smolinski v. Anselm (1923)
<p>226</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>EVIDENCE — (1) Expert witness sufficiently qualified to make evidence competent — (2) Reviewing-court will not disturb a verdict unless so clearly unsupported by evidence as to indicate bias.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 276Timberman v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 276Sprague v. Brown (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 276National Coal Co. v. Goffee (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 277Akron & B. Belt Rd. v. P. U. C. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 278State v. Industrial Com. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 278Globe Security & Loan Co. v. Carrell (1922)
<p>Error to Hamilton County Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 280Heddesheimer v. Thomann (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 280Lake Shore Elec. R. v. Toledo Terminal R. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 280Lewalsky v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 281Bacon v. Slabaugh (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 281Wahl Moving Co. v. Scott (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 281Cleveland Railway Co. v. McGill (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 281Tipton v. Schaeffer Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 282Szo v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 282Ohio Savings Bank Co. v. Marleau (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 282Ray v. Kachenmeister (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 282Pugh v. State (1923)
<p>No. 241</p> <p>PRACTICE — Bill of exceptions deficient.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 283Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Rose (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 283Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Wiesenberger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 283Dyer Co. v. Mergens (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 283Nunn v. Hutchison (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 284Nat. Foundation & Eng. Co. v. Toledo (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 284Kopek v. State (1923)
<p>Error to Cleveland Municipal Court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 291Payne v. Lind (1922)
<p>Error to Hamilton County Court .of Appeals</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 295Somers v. Woodland Realty Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 295L. S. Electric R. v. Robbins (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 295West. Reserve Greenhouse Co. v. Linden (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 296King Bridge v. Whitesell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 296Cooper Rubber Co. v. Fritz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 296Evans v. Randall (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 297Marple v. Stupca (1923)
<p>•No. 255</p> <p>This opinion -has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>EQUITY — (1) Appealibility of case-involving mistake in malting loan — (2) Rights as between bank and mortgager, where loss occhrs through mistake of one of bank’s agents.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 297Warren v. Cleveland (1923)
<p>No. 256</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>ORDINANCES — (1) Conviction of a violation of Ordinance Sec. 2271, without proof of width, traffic and usual rules of the street — (2) Conviction contrary to the evidence.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 297Maher v. Collection Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 298Brangle v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 298Soglovitz v. Morris Plan Bank (1923)
<p>No. 260</p> <p>PROMISSORY NOTES — (1) Withdrawal of signature by an, endorser — Notice required.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 298Downs v. Andrus (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 298W. & L. E. Ry. Co. v. Kohn (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 299Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Muntean (1923)
<p>No. 264</p> <p>INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY — (1) Prejudicial error in court’s charge — Vagueness. •</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 299Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Crystal (1923)
<p>Error to Cuyahoga Common Pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 299Laronge v. Cleveland (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 300Gallagher v. McIntyre (1923)
<p>No. 265</p> <p>APPEALS — (1)-Decree affirmed — Findings of court below adopted.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 300Polgar v. Paziczki (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 300Muscarella v. Theurer (1923)
<p>No. 269</p> <p>COVENANTS — (1) Action for breach of covenant of seizure where possession is undisturbed.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 300Wild v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 300Page v. May (1923)
<p>No. 267</p> <p>ERRORi — (1) Question of weight of evidence properly left to jury.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 306East Liverpool v. Pitt Const. Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 306Prettyman v. Pennsylvania Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 307Alter v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 307Barnes v. Christy (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 307Curtis v. State ex rel. Morgan (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 307Board of Education v. Korns (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 307Miller v. Korns (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 307State ex rel. Levy v. Taylor (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 308Miller v. Korns (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 309Anthony Carlin Co. v. Hines (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 310Loftus v. Pennsylvania Railroad (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 313Baumgardner v. Malloy (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 313Wright v. Chandler Motor Car Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 313Toledo Edison Co. v. Conway (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 313Keveney v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 314Hubbard v. Johnson (1923)
<p>No. 283</p> <p>CONTRACT — (1) Construction of contract in writing is duty of court — (2) Request to charge in a certain manner properly refused — (3 )Verdict manifestly excessive reversed.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 314Boswell v. N. O. T. & L. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 314Golner v. Lawrence (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 314Golner v. Wood (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 315Slabodker Bene. Cemetery Ass'n v. Garfield Heights (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 315East Cleveland v. Wald (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 315Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Bezoska (1923)
<p>No. 286</p> <p>LIABILITY — (1). No assumption of . liability in charge of court — (2) Repetitions of the same legal proposition when' there is only one theory to lawsuit, is not error. .</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 322Salmon Falls Mfg. Co. v. Midland Tiri & R. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 323Letta v. Cinci. Iron & Steel Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 323Maurer Co. v. Tubeless Tire Co. (1922)
<p>No. 289</p> <p>SALES — (1) Government regulations preventing performance held to terminate contract and not to extend time for delivery — (2) Could not require acceptance of a lump quantity to apply on past due installments.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 324Vaccarello v. Republic Engineers, Inc. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 324Johnson v. Peoples Trust & Sav. Bank (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 324United States v. Hilsinger (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 325McCree v. Hines (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 325Venner v. Mich. Cent. Ry. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 325Fugitt v. L. E. & W. R. (1923)
<p>No. 295</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>FEDERAL PRACTICE — (1) Remandability of case to state court — (2) The Federal Conformity Act does not apply to discretionary matters — (3) Dismissal on non-appearance of plaintiff — (4) Interpretation of Ohio GC. 11586.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 326In re Portage Rubber Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 326In re George (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 327LoSchiavio v. N. O. T. & L. Co. (1922)
<p>(Error to Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 327Ohio Collieries Co. v. Stuart (1923)
<p>No. 299</p> <p>CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE EMERGENCY ACT — (1) Right of plaintiff to have the question determined — (2) Interference with interstate commerce.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 328Winkler v. Barch (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 328Hooker v. Excelsior Realty Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 328Militz v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 328Pantazatos v. Jelm (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 329Coventry Land & Imp. Co. v. Pfeiffer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 329Industrial Com. v. Radanov (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 329Weiner Co. v. Citizens Sav. & Trust Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 330Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Haycox (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 330Rauffus v. Cleveland (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 331Jacoby v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 331Ruthven v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 331First Savings & Trust Co. v. Goodman Piano Co. (1923)
<p>No. 310</p> <p>APPEAL — (1) The right to appeal but a portion . of a case. MORTGAGES — (1) Priority betweeen / mortgagee’s claim and claim of creditor — Mort-1 gage covering merchandise.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 332Taplin-Rice-Clarkin Co. v. Ramsey (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 339Windsor v. United States (1923)
<p>No. 314</p> <p>CRIMINAL ’ LAW — (1) Conspiracy — Evidence of sustained — (2) Proof of unlawful acts — (3) Jury questions — (4) Instructions held to cure objections to argument of attorney — (5) Search and seizure —Affect of consent to search — (6) Objection to charge specific overt acts.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 339Salati v. United States (1923)
<p>No. 313</p> <p>NTOXICATING LIQUORS — O) Invalidity of search warrant — (2) Evidence, procedure under invalid warrant — (3) No waiver of rights to say “go ahead” to officer supposed to have a valid warrant.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 340Cleveland, C. C. v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 341Young v. American Strawboard Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 342Boravitz v. Hard Rubber Co. (1923)
<p>No. 317</p> <p>ALIEN ENEMIES — (1) Suspension, of Statute of Limitations and limitation period under Wrongful Death Act by war — (2) Administrator cannot sue for benefit of alien enemies — (3) Computation of statutory period.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 344Whitworth Moving & Storage Co. v. Walter (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 344Abrams v. Kangesser (1923)
<p>No. 318</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>AGENCY — (1) Corporation, the officers of which know of á ¡contract, bound by contract made by its authorized agent — (2) Undisclosed principal may be shown by oral evidence.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 344Industrial Commission v. Collela (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 345Summit-Cherry Co. v. Millrood (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 345Terpening v. Unger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 345Strong v. Strong (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 346Sammon v. Burgett (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 346Stevenson v. Maurer (1923)
<p>No. 324</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>EQUITY — (1) Contract relating to realty may be enforced by persons claiming under one of original parties — (2) Upon unconditional refusal to comply with contract, tender is unnecessary — (3) Laches sufficient to bar equitable relief must be delay working to disadvantage of other party.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 347State v. Herdman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 347Gelindo v. Nye (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 347Massillon-Tuscarawas Coal Co. v. Mills (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 348Gray Lumber Co. v. Davis (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 348Douglas v. Trump (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 348Prosser v. Kruger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 356Kobel v. Davis (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 356Steinen v. Industrial Fibre Corp. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 356Wiener (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 357Conrad v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 357Radke v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 357State v. Laughlin Coal Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 358Lathrop v. Kilbury (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 358Henry v. West Salem Equity Exchange Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 358Makranczy v. Gelfand (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 359Cleve. Trinidad Paving Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 359Sanborn v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 359Kimball-Childs Realty Co. v. McSweeney (1921)
<p>No. 341</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONS — (1) Contract to find a purchaser implies a purchaser able to pay— (2) Where seller deals with purchaser personally, a broker is only bound to find a purchaser, regardless of his financial ability.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 360Collins v. Collins (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 360Picciano v. Todan (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 360Grow v. Wenk (1922)
<p>No. 344</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstrae</p> <p>PREJUDICIAL ERROR — (1) Evidence not agains weight of evidence — (2) Conversations admissibl where the contract is not a written instrument;</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 360Goff-Kirby Coal Co. v. Fuel Corp. of America (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 361Knutson Motor Trucking Co. v. Cleveland Grays (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 361Orr v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 361Elyria v. Laemonouca (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 361Kubiak v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 363State v. Krajnyak (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 370Freiberg Mahogany Co. v. Batesville Lumber & Vender Co. (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 371State v. Kuhner (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 371Norpac Realty Co. v. Schackne (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 371Younger v. Halliday (1923)
<p>PRACTICE — (1) Amendment of pleading after waiver if jury does not cancel waiver — (2) Too late after trial and judgment, to raise "question as to which pleadings authorize.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 372Nicholson v. Cleveland Railway Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 372Moshontz Bros. v. Erie Dyeing & Processing Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 372National Garage Co. v. Geraci (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 373National Fire Insurance v. Frees (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 373Katz v. Rich (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 373Lovett v. Weidig (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 373Republic Brass Co. v. Gaskill (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 374Srutek v. Hart (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 374Cleveland National Bank v. Barry Bros. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 375Efros v. Seltzer-Round Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 375Fodor v. Hilmerich (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 376Cooper Rubber Co. v. Fritz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 376Lees-Bradner v. Hoffman Casting Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 376Stauffer v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 376Lynn v. Cochenour (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 386Woolfe v. Ohio Oil Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 387Wine v. Wine (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 387Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co. v. International Havester Co. of America (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 388Weiss v. Stearn (1923)
<p>No. 377</p> <p>This opinion has not been published exc»ot in Abstract.</p> <p>INTERNAL REVENUE — Income received by stockholders on reorganization of corporation.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 388Lakeside & Marblehead R. R. v. Davis (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 389Fix v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 389Board of County Commissioners v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 389State ex rel. Bushnell v. Board of County Commissioners (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County.</p> <p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 391Bishop & Babcock Co. v. Swift Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 391Mack v. Edelstein (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 391Cleveland Railway Co. v. Pring (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 391Champion v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 392Norton v. Henderson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 392Davis v. Eberly (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 393Grover v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 393Smolinski v. Jaworski (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 393Sandusky (City) v. Hardy (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 393Cleveland Met. Park Board v. Kettlewell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 394Lamborn v. Bender (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 394State v. Martinec (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 394Simonyi v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 394Miller v. Booth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 395Maher v. N. Y. C. R. R. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 396Rumenyak v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 397Ford v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 402General Elec. Co. v. C. S. W. & C. Ry. (1924)
<p>No. 406</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstra(</p> <p>EQUITY — (1) Municipality cannot under polii power require removal of railroad tracks to g grading, etc., done at expense of Railway.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 403Kuhn v. Pickands (1923)
<p>No. 407</p> <p>'his opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>CONTRACTS — (1) Parties contracting in own name bound, although acting for undisclosed principal— (2) Agent has same rights of defense as principal would have — (3) Counterclaim must be based on contract sued on — (4) Hules for measuring damage — (5) Unnecessary matter in counterclaim not grounds for demurrer.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 404State ex rel. Medical Centre Co v. Wallace (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 404State Tax Commission ex rel. Price v. Lamprecht (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 405State ex rel. King v. McClure (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 406Sawyer v. Friedman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 406Glow Electric Co. v. Bock Machine Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 407Miljenovic v. Dill (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 407Ferguson v. Porter (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 407Fenner v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 408Goodall v. Davis (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 408Hixson v. Snyder (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 408Bartlesville Salvage Mach. & Supply Co. v. B. & O. Railroad (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 408Puritan Oil Co. v. Hershiser (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 409Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co v. Wood (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 409Mares v. Brandt (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 409Chaffee v. Furlong (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 410In re Disbarment of Barnes (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 410Ferguson v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 410Jacobson v. Cleveland (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 411First Nat. Bank of Ashland v. Koslin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 411Sogolivitz v. Market Baking Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 411Bramson v. Bogrand (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 411Marsillon v. Farrell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 419In re National Window Glass Workers (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 419Penna R. v. Crouse (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 420Metropolitan Securities Co. v. Orlow (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 421Vance v. Davis (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 421State ex rel. Junk v. Herrick (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 421Foltz v. Boone (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 422Shaner v. Brooklyn Lumber Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 422Stone v. Coats (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 422Hyde Park Lumber Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 422Union Insurance Society v. C. Desalvo (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 423Scott v. I. Cord Tire & Belt Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 423Yowler v. Dayton (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 423Goodrich v. Cleveland (City) (1921)
<p>No. 437</p> <p>NEGLIGENCE — (1) Duty of pedestrian to look for traffic coming on the wrong side of street — (2) Error to direct verdict where evidence in conflict.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 423Ohio Traction Co. v. Sellner (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 424Churchill v. State (1921)
<p>No. 438</p> <p>BURKE LAW — (1) No delegation of legislative power — (2) Law uniform in operation — (3) Penalties — (4) Construction of apparent inconsistent statutes — (5) GC. 7246 -not in conflict with GC. 7247 — (6) No judicial or confiscatory power conferred by act.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 424Crawford v. Mirman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 424Thatcher v. L. S. Electric Ry. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 425Kreinbeihl v. Wagner (1923)
<p>Error to Hardin Common pleas</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 425Cleveland (City) v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 425Davis v. Le Blond Mach. Tool Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 426Whiteman v. Galvin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 426Anderson v. Belden (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 426Buffalo Mill Supply Co. v. Waverly (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 426Glaser v. Shiffer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 434Reliance Coal & Coke Co. v. Brydon & Bro., Inc. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 435State ex rel. Forchheimer v. LeBlond (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 435Lopez v. King Bridge Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 435United States v. Window Glass Mfgrs. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 436Bashore v. Brown (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 436Montanari v. Haworth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 436Cook v. Mozer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 437Herier & Co. v. Schaefer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 437Ford v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 437Industrial Commission v. Piascik (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 438Thomas v. Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 438Barrett v. Cox (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 439Chesapeake & Ohio R. v. Cole (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 439Whistle Co. v. Schueler (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 439Walsh v. Murman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 450Baron v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 451Dangelo v. McLean Fire Brick Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 451Dennison Brick & Tile Co. v. Chicago Trust Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 452Carnegie Steel Co. v. Zebich (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 452State v. Auerbach (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 452La France Electrical Construction & Supply Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (1923)
<p>STRIKES — Picketing during strike — Peaceable efforts to persuade other employes not to be enjoined.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 452Hadfield-Penfield Steel Co. v. Sheller (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 453State ex rel. Hunt & Dorman Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission (1923)
<p>WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — (1) Assignment of by Workman to employer, while claim is pending, allowable, when — (2) Notice of and to commission, and payment thereafter to the workman, does not prejudice assignee’s claim. ‘</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 453State ex rel. Hawke v. Le Blond (1923)
<p>COMMON PLEAS COURTS — (1) Sessions of, in counties having two or more judges — Number of judges who shall preside — (2) Jurisdiction of in disbarment, same as in other cases — (3) Judgment of suspension not void because period of is not definitely fixed therein — (4) Such judgment not open to collateral attack.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 453Wellston Iron Furnace Co. v. Rinehart (1923)
<p>STATUTES — (1) AH are remedial in their nature— Liberal construction of — (2) Survival of causes of action, after death of injured person.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 455Franklin v. County Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 455Warren Home Development Co v. Mahoning Park Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 455Capito v. DeLoreta (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 456Continental Sugar Co. v. Hulse (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 456Karayians v. State (1923)Reverse
<p>Error to Trumbull Court of Common Pleas.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 456Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Payne (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 457McDonald v. Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 457Dewey v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 457In re Taylor (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 458Toledo Soldiers' Memorial Ass'n v. Toledo (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 458Adams v. Adams (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 458Zieger v. Carnich Bros. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 459Joffin v. McEwan (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 459Shutrump v. Kaporalous (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 459Pritchard v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 466United States v. Gordin (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 466Standard Parts Co. v. Cleveland Welding & Mfg. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 467Ohio Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Fender (1923)
<p>WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — (1) Jury question — (2) Sec. 1027 GC. constitutes a lawful requirement — (3) Lawful requirement defined — (4) Cases 96 OS. 305; 105 OS. 1 and 161 overruled.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 467Myers v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance (1923)
<p>Agency — (1) Knowledge of or notice to, when binding upon principal — (2) LIFE INSURANCE— Effect of knowledge of physician examiner, not communicated to company.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 467Pittsburg Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission (1923)
<p>WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — (1) Review of an award by the Industrial - Commission, under 871-38 GC. — (2) Adequate remedy provided employer, to contest jurisdiction, provided by 1465-74 GC.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 467Hilton v. State ex rel. Bell (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 468Pope v. Mudge (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 468State v. Sabo (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Crawford county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 468City of Akron v. Butler (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Summit county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 468Walls v. Mitchell (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Pulton county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 468Village of Vinton v. James (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Gallia county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 470Edon Farmers Co. v. Podrasky (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 470Bowen v. Kolar (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 470B. & O. Railroad v. Warren (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 471Coleman v. Reed (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 471Graham v. Bergin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 471Columbus v. Neal (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 472Struthers Village v. Hughes (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 472Nat. Insurance Co. v. Welbon Motor Car Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 472Groff v. Insurance Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 472Coleman v. Renesch (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 473Shannon Co. v. Mitchell Furn. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 473B. & Ohio R. R. v. Suzich (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 482Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Doherty (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 483Knaggs v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 483Ohlen-Bishop Co. v. Schwarts-Hermann Steel Works, Inc. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 483House v. Penn. R. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 484Van Dorn Iron Works Co. v. Erie-Huron Realty Co. (1923)
<p>JURY TRIAL — (1) Waiver of, by conduct — Not after judgment — (2) APPEAL — Action for money and mechanic’s lien joined, but lien held invalid, not allowed — (3) MECHANIC’S LIEN — Right of stair contractor to lien.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 484Eledstein v. Cook (1923)
<p>NEGLIGENCE — (1) Sale of injurious drug to i customer — Recovery authorized — (2) Negligence presumed — Prima facie case established.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 484Murphy v. City of Toledo (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.</p> <p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Wooc county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 484Village of Perrysburg v. Ridgeway (1923)
<p>Error to the Court oi Appeals of Lucas county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 485Tesca v. State (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Licking county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 485Rings v. Borton (1923)
<p>WILLS — (1) Happening of an event, which may divest devisee — (2) Estate passes free from de-visee’s debts.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 485Village of Struthers v. Sokol (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Mahoning county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 485Schafer v. Haller (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Crawford county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 486Curtis v. State ex rel. Morgan (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Stark county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 486Underwood v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 487Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Hartzell Bros. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 487Taylor v. Cohasset Boulevard Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 487Rearick v. Strohl (1923)Judgment Affirmed
<p>No. 496</p> <p>ERROR — (1) Judgment affirmed.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 488Cotton v. Youngstown Steel Car Co. (1923)
<p>No. 498</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>ACCOUNTING — (1) Finding of referee supported by sufficient evidence — (2) Time that contract for bonus became operative — (3) Right to deduct income tax from profits as element of expense.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 488McCrory v. McCrory (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 488W. & L. E. R. v. Kilmbach (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 489Pischals v. Kosinski (1923)
<p>No. 502</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>ERROR — No prejudicial error found in record, notwithstanding conflicting testimony shown.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 489Schneider v. Box (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 489Lenz v. Lenz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 489Edgar v. King (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490Luthy v. P. C. C. & St. L. R. (1923)
<p>No. 506</p> <p>NEGLIGENCE — O) Train conductor's riding on engine foot-board — (2) Killed in head-on collision —a jury question — (3) Verdict for defendant that conductor’s negligence was a proximate cause contributing to his death, held contrary to weight of evidencei — (4) Conductor’s negligence in so riding did not change his status, so as to relieve railroad from using ordinary care. 4</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490Schick v. Ulland (1923)
<p>No. 507</p> <p>DEED — (1) Covenant against incumbrances broken by existence of a lien — (2) Recovery of nominal damages only — (3) Street assessment lien — Assumed as part of purchase price — Recovery of— (4) Payment of by covenantor subrogation of.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490Ipsaro v. Material Drivers' Union (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 498Sandusky Cement Co. v. Hamilton (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. Lansinger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499Krusoczky v. State (1923)
<p>INTOXICATING LIQUORS — (1) Actions under 6212-15, 16 GC. averments, as to nature of possession — (2) Sections constitutional.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499Industrial Commission v. Everett ex rel. Simmons (1923)
<p>WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — Independent contractors, not comprehended in Par. 3, Secs. 1465-61 GC., 108 OL. 316 — not employees.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499Meeker v. Scudder (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 500Industrial Commission v. Hogle (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Knox county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 500Adams v. Hollow Rock Mining & Transportation Co. (1923)
<p>APPEARANCE — (1) General demurred without res ervation as to jurisdiction waives right to object when — (2) Filing briefs — Court may fix time for dismissal of error proceedings for failure to fib in four months, not an abuse of discretion of court</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 500Toledo, Columbus & Ohio River Railroad v. Miller (1923)
<p>ORDINANCE — (1) Regulating speed of trains — not invalid^ as to fines and penalties — (2) Constitutionality and reasonableness, question of law— Must be clear and manifest — (3) Verdict for damages for personal injury — Not set aside unless.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 501Mellinger v. Mellinger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 501Mazena v. Orscheid (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 501Momenee v. Trupp (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 502Sadoski v. Sadoski (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 502Nicewander v. Scherer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 502Chambers v. King (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 503State Savings & Trust Co. v. Grady (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 503Traction & Light Co. v. Kenmore City (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 504Petrich v. Pa.-Ohio Electric Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 504Clyne v. Steel (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 504Capassa v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 504Aston v. Weiss (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 505Monitor Stove Co. v. Williamson Heater Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 505Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. McCartney (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 505L. S. Electric Ry. Co. v. Robbins (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 506Thomas v. Commissioners (Butler Co.) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 506Forest City Motor Co. v. Stuart (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 507Gilbert v. Durlist (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 507Goodell v. Hanley (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 507Shaffer v. Carr (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 518Industrial Com. v. Kenemy (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 518Gilman Motor Trucking Co. v. Federal Ins. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 518Carpenter v. Industrial Com. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 518Robinson v. Bunts (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 519Industrial Com. v. Voegel (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 519Callagher & National Surety Co. v. Nikolics (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 520Knight v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 520Gustafson v. Cleveland (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 520Bracken v. Leimkuehler (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 520McQuaid v. Shale (1923)
<p>No. 539</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>CHILDREN ON HIGHWAY — Duty owed to a child playing on the highway is at least equal to duty owed a traveller on the highway.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 521Miljenovic v. Dill (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 521Schwartz v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 521Peerless Paper Box Mfg. Co. v. LaBoiteaux Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 522Ford Realty Co. v. Steuer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 522Saligo v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 522Di Menna v. Sawyer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 523Gruszeczynski v. Przyburowski (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 523Finkelstein v. Cleveland (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 523McNeeley v. Cleveland (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 523Bettner v. Zeck (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 525Hamilton v. Leyman-Buick Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 534State v. DeBarbour (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 534James v. Cleveland (City) (1923)
<p>No. 554</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>ORDINANCES — (1) Failure to designate the proper place where an alleged violation was committed— (2) Section 2274 of the Municipal Ordinances of Cleveland invalid.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 534Columbus (City) v. Geren (1923)
<p>No. 552</p> <p>This opinion has no.t been published excepc in Abstract.</p> <p>PROCEDURE — No leave required to file petition in error from Municipal Court of Columbus in Common Pleas — ORDINANCE—A city ordinance which reaffirms a statute is not thereby unconstitutional if it also contains other matter which is valid under the constitution.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 535Sczepkowski v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 535Crawford v. Crawford (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 535Claus Mfg. Co. v. Continental Casualty Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 536Miller v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 536Jacobsen v. Committee (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 536Daykin v. Daykin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 537N. Y. C. & St. L. R. v. Biermacher (1923)
<p>No. 561</p> <p>FEDERAL EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY ACT — (1) Application of res ipsa loquitur under this act— (2) Burden of proof under this act — (3) Assumption of risk — PRACTICE (k) Failure of court to send deposition to jury room — (5) To constitute error the alleged error must be clearly prejudicial.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 537McIntire v. Holmes (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 537State ex rel. Cleveland v. Zangerle (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 538Chesko v. Chesko (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 538Boyer v. Mast (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 538Schorger v. Schorger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 538Chapman v. Buckeye Tire & Supply Co. (1923)
<p>No. 567</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>RECEIVERSHIP — (1) Construction of receiver’s authorization — (2) Buying on credit equivalent to . borrowing.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 539Ricketts v. C. M. & L. Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 539Lawrence Electric Co. v. Enterprise Lumber Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 539Johnson v. Schulte (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 550Oyler v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 550Groesbeck v. Mayer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 550Crane v. Works (1923)
<p>No. 572</p> <p>NEGLIGENCE — (1) No error in court’s charge on the question of violating speed ordinance — (2) Violator of GC. 12603 is presumptively guilty of negligence — (3) Verdict not manifestly against the weight of evidence.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 551Scherman v. Allard (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 551O'Connor v. Cincinnati (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 551Morgan v. Houseworth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 551Sargent v. Cincinnati (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 552In re Estate of Miles (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 552Hunt v. Warner (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 552Allen v. Island Creek Coal Co. (1923)
<p>No. 578</p> <p>This opinion-has not b -pm published exe -ot in Abstract.</p> <p>PRACTICE — (1) Verdict not manifestly against the weight of evidence under the facts and circumstances of the case.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 552Board of Education v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 553Endress v. Insurance Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 553Badgley v. Shue (1923)
<p>No. 582</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>EXECUTION — A right of property action against . a constable decided adversely to the claimant is final and the claimant cannot recover in a subsequent action, for damages against the constable for selling the property.'</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 553Greenville Fertilizer Co. v. Irwin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 553Clark v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 553Fredrich v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 554Ex parte McIntire (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 554Parmele v. Daedelow (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 554Dister v. McInerney (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 554Houck v. Kaplan (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 566Shafer v. Pattern Makers League (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 566Lust v. Klein (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 566Whistle Co. v. Schueler (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 566Bloom v. Ray (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567Parish Bros. v. Thompson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567Hinaman & Hedden v. Bowers (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 567Jalkanson v. Am. Construction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568Theodor Kundtz Co. v. Harmon (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Sweeney (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568American Ship Building Co. v. National Machinery Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568Wadley v. Roth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 569Waxman v. Wilcox (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 569Halle Bros. v. Kozloski (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 569Curran v. Kelley (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 570Damon v. Medina (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 570George v. Johnson Candy Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 570Murray v. Young (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 571Travelers Ins. Co. v. Wadsworth (Village) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 571Baltimore & O. R. v. Warehouse Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572Waits v. Devou (1923)
<p>MEDICAL TESTIMONY — Court’s power to appoint physicians to make physical examination in personal injury case — (2) An ideal method in personal injury and similar other cases.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572Land v. Schroeder (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572Zwisler v. Aetna Life Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572Spiegel v. Kraus (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 580Balt. & O. R. v. Groeger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 582Downing v. Downing (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 582Emline v. Penn. R. (1923)
<p>No. 614</p> <p>Tl'is opinion has not been published except in Abstrae</p> <p>ASSUMPTION OF RISK — (1) Under the Feders Employers’ Liability Act the question of assumj tion of risk is usually a question for the jury-12) Direction of verdict.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 582Surman v. Terrell (1923)
<p>No. 613</p> <p>This opinion lias not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>ASSAULT AND BATTERY — (1) Inadmissibility of evidence showing conduct of ■ plaintiff some time after assault — (2) Inadnrssibility of conduct of defendant at later time — (3) Verdict manifestly against weight of evidence — (4) Only those errors can be considered' on review to which an exception is taken.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 583Ballard v. State (1923)
<p>No. 615</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>ATTORNEY FEES — Police prosecutor, not city solicitor, is entitled to allowance of county commissioners to police prosecutor, for handling its legal matters.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 583Rozewicz v. Polsky Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 583Wheatcraft v. Hall (1922)
<p>No. 616</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>DESCENT OF PROPERTY — (1) Facts showing that real estate was ancestral property.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 584Evans v. Scudder (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 584Snyder v. Bickley (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 584B. & W. Rubber Co. v. Carter (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 584Morewood Realty Co. v. Amazon Rubber Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 585Pardee v. Zalkin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 585Bartley v. National Business Men's Ass'n (1923)
<p>No. 622</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>INSURANCE — Effect of Statute of Limitations on insurance policy.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 586Olson Construction Co. v. Marshall (1923)
<p>No. 624</p> <p>This opinion has not been'published except in Abstract.</p> <p>JURY TRIALS — (1) Rig lit of counsel to inquire as to whether any of the jurors are employed' by liability companies.</p> <p>NEGLIGENCE — (2) Agent acting within scope of employment — (3) Excessive verdict;</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 586Arnold v. Trauberman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 596Rothlisberger v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 598Elias & Lowenstein Co. v. Common Sense Novelty Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 598Bowden v. Meade (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 598Stark Electric R. R. v. Hostetler (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 599Losee v. Krieger (1923)
<p>No. 631</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>PLEADINGS — (1) Prayer of petition no part of it— (2) No specific form of pleading required under GC. 10673.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 599Braun v. Pociey (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 599Davis v. Keller (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 600Healey v. American Ship Building Co. (1923)
<p>No. 634</p> <p>This opinión has not been published e<</p> <p>WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — Application for compensation is an action and proceeding.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 600Union Land & B. Co. v. Youngstown (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 601Congregation Shara Torah v. Ditto Chased Shel Emes (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 601State v. Conas (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 601Greenbaum v. Milas (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 611Crystal Paper Co. v. Robertson Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 611Templar Motors Co. v. Bay State Pump Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 612State ex rel. Barrett v. Cleveland (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 612State v. Ritzler (1923)
<p>No. 639</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>JUSISDICTION — Prosecution by information under GC. 13049 — (2) Prosecutor may himself make out affidavit.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 612Platers Supply Co. v. General Supply Co. (1923)
<p>No. 640</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>EVIDENCE — (1) Submission of requested charge] to jury before argument — (2) Failure to define “merchantable” in action for goods sold.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 613Gentsch v. Beville (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 613Thieken v. State (1923)
<p>No. 642</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>PXTON-SUPPORT — (1) Technical errors in court’s charge — (2) Verdict not manifestly against weight of evidence.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 613Perrine v. Gerrine (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 613Cincinnati (City) v. Robinson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 614Akron Cold Spring Co. v. Unknown Heirs of Ely (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 614Wade v. Adams (1923)
<p>No. 645</p> <p>Thi» opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>EVIDENCE — Judgment rendered on uncorroborated testimony.</p> <p>(Note: The. facts of the case are not given in the opinion.)</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 614Zwisler v. Aetna Life Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 614Willey v. Lewis (1923)
<p>No. 647</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>NEGLIGENCE — No recovery if petition discloses plaintiff’s negligence and does not plead last clear chance.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 615Camp Roosevelt Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 615Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Payne (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 616Estate of Andrew (1923)
<p>Appealed by L. M. Westropp and M. R. Andrew</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 616Kirchner v. Mill (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 616Harris v. Manhattan Real Estate Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 617Luthy v. P., C., C. & St. L. R. R. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 627Pennsylvania v. Virginia (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 628Douglas Packing Co. v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 628Pohl v. State (1923)
<p>No. 655</p> <p>105. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.</p> <p>Statute relative to teaching of foreign languages held unconstitutional.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 629United States v. Salberg (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 629B. & O. R. R. v. De Leone (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 630Berryman v. Klein (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 630Diver v. Beloit (Village) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 630Safe Cabinet Co. v. Globe Wernicke Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 631Adams v. Adams (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 631Selbarlaetner v. Uhmann (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 631Weaver v. Miller (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 631Funk Equity Co. v. Covert (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 632Odell v. Firestone (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 632Kemple v. Farina (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 632Simpson v. Schofield (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 632Payerle v. Yates (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 668Wessel v. Goldflies (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 668Youngstown Ry. Co. v. Miskell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 668Zimmerman v. Murphy (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 669Harrigan v. Walker (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 669Fisher v. Euclid (Village) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 669Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Gramont (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 669Price v. Critchfield (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 670Levy v. Levy Overall Manuf. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 670Arnold v. Arnold (1923)
<p>No. 679</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>151. DIVORCE.</p> <p>Extreme cruelty — Gross neglect of duty — Pleading (294). (</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 670Tuchfarber v. Grause (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 671Hussuto v. Youngstown (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 671Griffith v. Graves (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 671Booth v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 672Cleveland Railway Co. v. McCartney (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 672Cleveland Railway Co. v. Castella (1923)
<p>No. 684</p> <p>166. ERROR.</p> <p>Reviewing court will not consider weight of evidence — Facts showing that jur" was justified in finding that injuries were due to accident.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 672Wellen v. Brandhorst (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 672Highland Park v. Kohler (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 673Neckel v. Fox (1923)
<p>No. 687</p> <p>231. LANDLORD AND TENANT.</p> <p>Apartment Houses — Owner of flat not liable for injuries sustained on private porch.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 673Howey v. Metcalf (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 673Guggenheim v. Culbertson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 673Youngstown v. Wilkoff (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 674Vojtect v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 674Cincinnati Trac. Co. v. Bollman & Sons Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 674Greensberger v. Pick & Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 675Parker v. Youngstown Municipal Ry. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 675Sherwood v. Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 675Newton v. Industrial Commission (1923)
<p>No. 696</p> <p>384. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION.</p> <p>An act not applicable to non-resident employe of Ohio corporation under contract made in Ohio for services to be perf- rmed outside state (383).</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 676Bauer v. Huth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 676McCullough v. Cinci. & Suburban Bell Tel. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 683Newton Tea & Spice Co. v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 685Leuthold v. Albright (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 685Everett v. Farmers Bank Co. (1923)
<p>No 702</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>110. CONVERSION.</p> <p>Measure of damages — Bonds stolen from alleged bailee — Evidence establishes bank as bailee.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 685Lee v. Marion (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 686Hollinger v. Hyatt (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 686Buschelmann v. Cincinnati (1923)
<p>No. 705</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>166. ERROR.</p> <p>What constitutes reversib’e — If two issues submitted to jury, such as a finding of either will entitle to judgment — Not to be reversed for incorrect charge/ on measure of damages.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 686Witt v. McDonough (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 687Wheeler v. Wannamaker (1923)
<p>No. 706</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract-.</p> <p>185. FRAUD.</p> <p>Evidence necessary to set aside a conveyance for fraud — Necessary to prove more than falsehoods— .deception necessary.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 687Wagner Stone Co. v. Dawley (1923)
<p>No. 708</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>259. ■ MUNICIPAL LAW.</p> <p>(1) Members of council are not officers of corporation within meaning of GC. 17 — (2.) Only those contracts executed by an administrative officer come within section 17 GC. — (3) Individual liability of members of municipal council,</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 687Copeland v. Marion (City) (1923)
<p>No. 707</p> <p>■’his opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>1>9. MUNICIPAL LAW.</p> <p>I Ordinance — (1) Constitutionality of weed ordinance — (2) Fact that vegetation was growing prior o passage oí ordinance does not render ordinance etroac-tive.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 698State ex rel. Kerney v. Forney (1923)
<p>341. STATUTES.</p> <p>Exceptions to operations of to be strictly construed —-Sec. Id, Art. II, Constituoion, as to referendum of Acts of Assembly, to be so construed.</p> <p>355. TAXATION.</p> <p>The language of Art. II, Sec. Id, “laws providing for tax levies,” is limited, not synonymous with terms in certain other tax laws.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 699Oberlander v. Hadfield-Penfield Steel Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 699Wagner v. Thrush (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 699Smith v. Watson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 700Rohn v. Leach (1923)
<p>No. 715</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>153. DOWER.</p> <p>Contract for sale of real estate before marriage transfers- equitable interest and no dower attaches upon marriage.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 700Keller v. Wright (1923)
<p>No. 716</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract</p> <p>156. EASEMENT.</p> <p>Abandonment of use of a right of way causes reversion of title — Merchantable title.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 700Allshouse v. Emerald Twp. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 701March v. Nelson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 701Scheiderer v. McKinzie (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 701Jones v. Board of Education (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 702Haas v. Board of Education (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 702Norton v. Henderson (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 703Swin v. Knepper (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 703Collin v. Collin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 715Scott v. Saunders (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 718Emerine v. Votaw (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 718Magnolia Realty Co. v. Hunter (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 718Trowbridge v. Bucyrus Provident Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 719Keveney v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 719State v. Ritzler (1923)
<p>No. 732</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>129. CRIMINAL LAW.</p> <p>“Complaint” in 13049 GC. includes Probate Court ■ — Affidavit may be supplied by Prosecuting Attorney.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 720Noyer v. Pickering (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 720First Nat. Bank of Van Wert v. Coil (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 720Fairbanks v. Ridgeway (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 721Wade v. Walden (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 721Mosier v. Jones (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 721Reynolds v. Defiance (City) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 722Amoroso v. Angelo (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 722State v. Herrick (1923)
<p>No. 742</p> <p>326A. ROADS.</p> <p>Contracts — Highway Director may change afte| bid is let, but questionable power — Work having been completed without complaint is should bt| paid for.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 723Popov v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 723Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Donley (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 731Pennsylvania R. v. Schafer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 731Am. Foundry Equip. Co. v. Wadsworth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 732Firestone v. City of Cambridge (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 733Cole v. Jenkins (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 733Niedler v. Mack (1923)
<p>No. 750</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>165. EQUITY.</p> <p>As between two innocent persons the one must suffer who makes it possible for the wrong-doer to perpetrate a wrong — Disposal of crops, by tenant, without landlord’s knowledge.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 733Blockberger v. Miller (1923)
<p>No. 748</p> <p>iis opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>17. CONTRACTS.</p> <p>All questions of damages to be left to the jury to lamine. The finding of the lower court as to the of the agreement will not be reversed in this</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 733DeMore v. State (1923)
<p>No. 749</p> <p>129. CRIMINAL LAW.</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>Transporting Liquors — Accused may be found guilty on uncontradicted prima facie case.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 734Delventhal v. Ross (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 734Gearheart v. Drivers' Indemnity Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 734Taylor v. Bauman (1923)
<p>No. 751</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>166. ERROR.,</p> <p>Where verdict is against, weight of evidence, case, must be remanded.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 735Zane Development Synd. v. Kurtz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 735Columbus Mut. Life Ins. v. Jordan (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 735Mominger v. Mominger (1923)
<p>No. 755</p> <p>is opinion lias not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>2. PARTITION.</p> <p>Decree of will not be set aside on motion where it pears that the proceeding was regular and that fie complaining party had due notice thereof.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 736Everett v. Hopley Printing Co. (1923)
<p>No. 757</p> <p>This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.</p> <p>PRACTICE.</p> <p>Continuance-Discretionary with trial court-• Unless abuse of discretion is party's prejudice-. New trial not to be ordered because of imprison-meat in penitentiary of party asking for, when case was heard.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 736Kohl v. Crum (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 737Co-op. Machinery Co. v. Parker Appliance Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 747United States v. Freund (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 747United States v. Intoxicating Liquors (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 750Dull v. Am. Phone & Telegraph Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 750Krug v. Roberts (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 750Knoll v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 751Frank v. New Waterford Sav. & Banking Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 751Dayton v. Bradford (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 751State v. Tefanov (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 751Cosmopolitan Bank & Savings Co. v. Roth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 752Bucyrus Tobacco Co. v. Drum & Katchke (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 752Borger v. Evans (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 752Scott v. Interlock. Cord Tire & Belt Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 753Bowman v. Greiner (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 753Waymire v. Board of Education (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 754Kline v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 754Mull v. Morris (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 755Smith v. Pinkerton's Agency (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 755Taxis v. So. Ohio Sav. & Trust Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 763Ohio Colleries Co. v. Stuart (1923)
<p>No. 780</p> <p>104. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.</p> <p>(1) Where a statute provides certain penalties for its violation, the repeal or inoperation of the statute does not render th!e question of its constitutionality a moot question — (2) Disclaimer of state officers ta enforce the law does not render question of its constitutionality a moot question — (3) Ohio Emergency Act of 1922 held unconstitutional.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 763Logan v. Chrissengen (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 766Cole v. Jenkins (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 766Laughbaum v. Flickinger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 767Clabaugh v. Clabaugh (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 767Roelle v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 767Lincoln v. Tatum (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 767Kinsey v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 768Morton v. State (1923)
<p>No. 787</p> <p>172. EVIDENCE.</p> <p>Depositions — Not prejudicial error to refuse to allow accused to attend deposition taken on his behalf outside state under 13668-3 GC — Epecially when counsel for accused was present and helped take the deposition, and it was used in the trial to establish the defense.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 768Auer v. Croft (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 769Evans v. Columbus Ry., P. & L. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 769Schwab v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 769Hefflinger v. Grohn (1923)
<p>No. 791</p> <p>68. NEGLIGENCE.</p> <p>Rule of res ipsa loquitur (negligence not shown)-, pplicable where employee is injured while dynamiting.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 770Gardner v. Hoover (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 770Gettman v. Pugh (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 771Breen v. Dow Drug Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 779Angenello v. United States (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 779In re D (1923)
<p>No. 798</p> <p>86. CITIZENSHIP.</p> <p>(FED.) — Alien who claimed exemption from draft as conscientious objector, is ineligible for citizenship.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 781Miller v. Hempy (1923)
<p>No. 802</p> <p>82. CHARGE TO JURY.</p> <p>Failure of counsel to point out omissions and errors in charge works estoppage of error.</p> <p>107. CONTRACTS.</p> <p>Purchase of the realty as evidence of breach of, as tending to show soon expiration of lease of place where business conducted.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 781Serrer v. Bartholmew (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 781Chandler v. Everette (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 782Conger v. Carmichael Const. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 782Hallen v. Campbell (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 782Kirk v. Weldy (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 782Selbarlaetner v. Uhlman (1923)
<p>No. 803</p> <p>165. EQUITY AND EQUITABLE RELIEF.</p> <p>In action to subject equitable interests, failure to show substantial interest justifies verdict directed for defendant.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 783Szakal v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 783Walsh v. Humphrey Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 783Schur v. Steinfeld (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 784Grimm v. Boyd (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 791Goldman v. Krumholz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 791Bonte v. Cunningham-Holmes Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 795Silver Co. v. Federal Trade Com. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 795Big Run Coal Co. v. Matthew Addy Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 796Nalty v. Local Union No. 65 (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 797Bailey v. State (1923)
<p>No. 817</p> <p>82. CHARGE TO JURY.</p> <p>General exception to charge is not sufficient to raise question of omission such as larceny when grand larceny charged.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 797Lincoln v. Tatum (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 798Potts v. Potts (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 798Herrick v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 798Layer v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 800Miller v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 800Pittsburg Tin Plate v. Goodman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 800Neill v. Commissioners (Franklin County) (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 801DeMore v. State (1923)
<p>No. 825</p> <p>¡25. INTOXICATING LIQUORS.</p> <p>May convict of transporting on circumstantial evi-lence — Court may take into consideration failure if defendant to take the stand, and explain proof Lgainst him.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 801Mosier v. Jones (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 801Cincinnati (City) v. Rogers (1922)
<p>No. 827</p> <p>To appear in Vol. 16, Appeals Reports.</p> <p>232A. LEASE.</p> <p>Of canal waters in Cincinnati, by the State, for milling purposes, gives no vested rights to lessees— Subsequent grant to the city stipulating for protection of water claimants, not obligatory — Contract of a rapid transit company to pay, is without consideration — And lacks authority to enter into.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 802Flynn v. Engineers Radio Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 802Santone v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 803State v. Bouley (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 803Laronge v. Ingle (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 803Karpf v. Jacobs (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 804Kaufman v. Welsh (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 804Akron (City) v. Stojanovic (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 810Toledo Fence & Post Co. v. Lyons (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 811De Witt v. State ex rel. Crabbe (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 811State v. Karayians (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 812State v. Brozich (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Gramont (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Harbaugh v. City of Piqua (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Newton v. Industrial Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. v. Todino (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Weiland v. Barth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Bartley v. National Business News Ass'n (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813City of Cincinnati v. O'Connor (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Gantz v. Good (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Industrial Commission v. Vail (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. R. v. Biermacher (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Sparrow v. Levine (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Stover v. City of Piqua (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Cook v. Sager (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813Spencer v. Board of Education (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 814Latham v. Folkerth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 814Sieg v. State (1923)
<p>No. 839</p> <p>54A. BASTARDS.</p> <p>Incapacity or inaccessibility of husband is essential to prove child born in wedlock illegitimate — Wife competent witness to prove illegitimacy of child— Adulterous ■ acts of wife not sufficient alone to rebut -presumption of-'legitimacy. 129 — CRIMINAL. LAW. Variance exists between averment that accused failed to support legitimate child and proof thal child was illegitimate.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 815Union News Co. v. Freeborn (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 815Corrigan v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 815Aubley v. Novogroder (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 816Lenz v. Lenz (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 816Gammel v. Sisser (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 816Spaeth v. Roth (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 817Kensington Hotel v. Weinman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 817Bates v. Firestone (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 817Trumbull Cliffs Furnace Co. v. Shackovsky (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 818State v. Kiner (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 818Akron (City) v. Penhorwood (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 819Maranda v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 819London v. Kornman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 820Brockel v. Precision Equipment Co. (1923)
<p>No. 854</p> <p>172. EVIDENCE.</p> <p>Burden of proof is on employe seeking to enforce contract (107) for sale of corporation bonds.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 820Harris v. Mentges (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Judy v. Trollinger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Pennsylvania R. R. v. Hale (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Western Mfg. Co. v. Baumgardner (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Black v. Black (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Bramson v. Bogrand (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Carpenter v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826City of Marion v. Lee (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Floyd v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Simons v. Hartshorn (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826Frederickson v. Nye (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 826State ex rel. Ryan v. Patton (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 827Noctor v. State ex rel. Lineham (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 828Best v. McClure (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 830Vargo v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 830Hoiles v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 831Doolittle v. Bowman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 831Sudano v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 831Red Star Transportation Co. v. Studebaker Lines (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 832Cleveland (City) v. Legal News Publishing Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 832Schmidt v. Rose (1923)
<p>No. 867</p> <p>268. NEGLIGENCE.</p> <p>Doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is merely interference from which negligence may be drawn. 47. AUTOMOBILES. Occasional general inspection of auto by competent agents constitutes ordinary care.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 832Smalley v. Frischley (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 833Dice v. Industrial Com. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 833Spindler v. Ashgraft (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 833Gordon Co. v. Houghton & Dutton Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 834Roegge v. Wertheimer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 834Courtland Building Co. v. Blumenthal (1923)
<p>No. 873</p> <p>231. LANDLORD AND TENANT:</p> <p>Occupation by tenant without oejection of premises which have been repaired by landlord as condition precedent to commencement of leasehold, work waiver of tenant’s right to object thereafter to improvements — Structural Changes mentioned, which are acts of waste.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 834Roberts v. Krug (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835Cincinnati Builders Supply Co. v. Gran (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835Bader v. Cincinnati (City) (1923)
<p>241. LOTTERIES.</p> <p>Consideration in a strict contractural sense not (required.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835Oppenheimer v. Oppenheimer Ptg. Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Davis v. Vance (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Hatfield & Penfield Steel Co. v. Oberlander (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Baldauf v. Davidson. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Buckeye Union Mutual Insurance v. Rousseff (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Carpenter v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Cramer v. Morris (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Hamilton v. Board of County Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Johnson v. Ramsey (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Knappenberger v. Brinkman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Nickler v. Nickler (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Oberlander v. Myers (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842Waymire v. Board of Education (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842State v. Sanborn (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 843Hamilton v. Board of County Commissioners (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 846Lamon v. Wiltberger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 846Schippacasse v. Garman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 846Wilkoff Co. v. Smith (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 847Symons v. Eichelberger (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 847General Fireproofing Co. v. Trampush (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 847Ramus & Jackson (1923)
<p>No. 886</p> <p>45. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.</p> <p>Does not lie for civil action for slander, or in abence of allegation ofvconspiracy to commit unlaw-ul acts.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 848Pierce v. Booher (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 848Niro v. Fabry (1923)
<p>No. 889</p> <p>269. NEW TRIAL.</p> <p>Failure of affidavit for new trial based on newly discovered evidence to set forth “due diligence” asMM the matter contained therein defeats review.</p> <p>327. SALES.</p> <p>Record of outstanding chattel mortgage held no excuse for failure to give notice thereof.</p> <p>166. ERROR.</p> <p>Bill of exceptions must contain all of evidence to review weight — Errors in court’s charge not considered unless the bill of exceptions contains charge.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 849State v. Brown (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 849TOLEDO, C. & O. R. v. Miller (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Boone v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Cramer v. Bettman (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Flatau v. City of Toledo (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859In re the Ohio Bell Telephone Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Marqua v. Martin (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Matthews v. Huwe (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859John Weenick & Sons Co. v. McInerney (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Snedaker v. King (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Bayless v. Baird (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Gilbert v. Durliat (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Keveney v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Lake Erie, Alliance & Wheeling R. R. v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Long v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859O'Brien v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Pennsylvania R. R. v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Perkins v. Bright (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Riley v. McNickol (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Tax Commission v. Oswald (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Bickley v. Carr (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Cox v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Draunmiller v. Fairchilds Milling Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Groesbeck v. Mayer (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Grogan v. Western Hills Building, Savings & Loan Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Morris v. Mull (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Sargent v. City of Cincinnati (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 859Theodor Kundtz Co. v. Harmon (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 860Pennsylvania Railroad v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
<p>Error to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 860Lake Erie, Alliance & Wheeling Railroad v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
<p>Error to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 860Riley v. Patrick McNichol (1923)
<p>326A. ROADS AND HIGHWAYS.</p> <p>Corrugated lead pipe at bottom of an embankment held not a culvert within meaning of 7563 GC, so as to impose liability for failure to erect and maintain guard rails.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861Long v. State (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Belmont county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861Keveney v. State (1923)
<p>29. CRIMINAL LAW.</p> <p>Limits of cross-examination of witness — Prejudicial error results only where record clearly shows abuse of discretion by the court — INDICTMENT affords no presumption or inference of guilt— EVIDENCE of other indictments of defendants for impeachments, not properly supported; motion to strike from record and to caution jury, should be sustained by court.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861Cohen v. Goldberger (1923)
<p>45. ATTORNEY AND CLIENT.</p> <p>Lien of attorney for fees and costs earned in litigation — Claim for has priority over debts to general creditors, and in this case superior to those of a partnership of which he was a member.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861Boone v. State (1923)
<p>225. INTOXICATING LIQUORS.</p> <p>State courts take, judicial notice of regulations of Prohibition Commissioner — Permit liquors not to be isolated — 294. PETITION ON ERROR. Statutory limitation for civil actions does not apply to criminal. Sections 11564 and 13680 apply only to trial courts — INTENT, not an element of offense of unlawful possession under 6212-15 GC.'</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 862Perkins v. Bright (1923)
<p>Error to the Court of Appeals of Belmont county.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 862Tax Commission v. Oswald (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 862Marqua v. Martin (1923)
<p>231. LANDLORD AND TENANT.</p> <p>Owner of building out of possession and control not liable to persons on the premises, invitees of the lessee.</p> <p>341. STATUTES.</p> <p>Language of a codified section construed by meaning of words used regardless of the prior statute— 12578 GC., so far as provisions apply to one who constructs a building, limited by the succeeding fourteen sections.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 865Perrysburg (Village) v. Ridgeway (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 865La France Elec. Co. v. Elec. Workers (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 866Hilton v. State (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 866Vinton (Village) v. James (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 867Wellston Iron Furnace Co. v. Rinehart (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 868Industrial Commission v. Everett (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 868State ex rel. Hunt v. Industrial Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 869McKay v. State (1923)
<p>No. 906</p> <p>129. CRIMINAL LAW.</p> <p>Withdrawal allowed after sentence of plea of guilty of embezzlement, induced by promises of leniency, and proof of offset established.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 869Schaeffer v. Spitzig (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 870Bennett v. Berlin Bakeries Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 870Tabler v. Ohio State Mortgage Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 875Telinde v. Ohio Traction Co. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 875Oetting v. Sparks (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 876State ex rel.Lueders v. Beaman (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 878Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Public Utilities Commission (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 878Lima Toledo R. v. Public Util. Com (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 879Edelstein v. Cook (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 879Pittsburg Coal Co v. Industrial Com. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 880State ex rel. Conner v. Noctor (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 880Korner v. Cosgrove (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 881McGowan v. Portsmouth (City) (1922)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 882New Boston (Village) v. Public Util. Com. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 882Portsmouth (City) v. Public Util. Com. (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 884Bissinger v. State (1923)
<p>No. 827</p> <p>183. FALSE PRETENSES.</p> <p>Indictment charging false pretenses again^fac-cused in securing check for money failing tW^er that subscriber was so induced to take stock in corporation, held defective — That check was given in county where alleged inducement was made — Questions as to purchaser’s relying on representations or own investigation should be excluded.</p> <p>129. CRIMINAL LAW.</p> <p>Other transactions admissible to show same representations to prosecuting witness.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 884Luft v. Borzykowski (1923)
<p>No. 826</p> <p>107. CONTRACTS.</p> <p>Expert chemist employed by manufacturer of one process on percentage basis, after futile effort to correspond with employer, by assisting another manufacturer of same product by different process, is not engaged in competing business in breach of contract, preventing accounting.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 885New York Central R. R. v. Logar (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 885Hawkins v. Comerford (1923)
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 886Krueger v. Krueger (1923)
<p>No. 930</p> <p>282. PARTITION.</p> <p>Partition as well as contribution is available to child bom after will executed.</p>
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 886Jamieson v. Davis (1923)
<p>No. 931</p> <p>304. PROCESS.</p> <p>Summons issued against railroad in other than county where 'injury to property occurred was quashed — 11273 GC. controls.</p>