Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Ohio St. 2d 77

Ball v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1965

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1965-01-20

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-01-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2008

4 state decisions

2019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1In this action, petitioner is attacking only the validity of his 1961 convictions. Inasmuch as petitioner is still subject to detention under his 1960 convictions habeas corpus does not lie. To entitle one to relief by habeas corpus a determination of the action in petitioner’s favor must effectuate a release from present confinement. Page v. Green, Supt., 174 Ohio St. 178; Neal v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 206; and Lowther v. Maxwell, Warden, 175 Ohio St. 39.

¶2Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
/1/ohiost2d/77 · .json · Public domain