Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 OHIOST3D 89 - Pembaur v. Leis

Pembaur v. Leis’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

277
cited by 277 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

275 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 277 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Landis v. Grange Mutual Insurance (1998), Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. (1997)

275 state decisions

79019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Anderson v. Air West, Inc. · 137 Ohio St. 448 - Steiner v. Custer · Herbert E. Theilmann, Administrator of Herbert K. Theilmann v. The Rutland Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Donald D. Dingman · Clarence Marshall, Jr. v. Allyn R. Sielaff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 277 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “connotes more than an error of law or of judgment; it implies an unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable attitude on the part of the court.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]here the plaintiff fails to prosecute, or comply with these rules or any court order, the court upon motion of a defendant or on its own motion may, after notice to the plaintiff's counsel, dismiss an action or claim.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Pursuant to Civ. R. 41(B)(1), it is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to dismiss an action, with prejudice, for lack of prosecution when a plaintiff voluntarily fails to appear at a hearing, without explanation, when the court has directed him to be present and his location is unknown.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.