In Re Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 114 Wash. 2d 802 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Cook · 117 Wash. 2d 128 - Weyerhaeuser Company v. Tri · 125 Wash. 2d 305 - Timberline Air Service, Inc. v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC. · 105 Wash. 2d 683 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Taylor · 97 Wash. 2d 818 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Hagler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a person has previously filed a petition for personal restraint, the court of appeals will not consider the petition unless the person certifies that he or she has not filed a previous petition on similar grounds, and shows good cause why the petitioner did not raise the new grounds in the previous petition. Upon receipt of a personal restraint petition, the court of appeals shall review the petition and determine whether the person has previously filed a petition or petitions and if so, compare them. If upon review, the court of appeals finds that the petitioner has previously raised the same grounds for review, or that the petitioner has failed to show good cause why the ground was not raised earlier, the court of appeals shall dismiss the petition on its own motion without requiring the state to respond to the petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“includes no reference whatsoever to [CrR 7.8(b) ], and there is no other reason to believe that the phrase `petition for personal restraint' in RCW 10.73.140 was intended to include any other form of collateral challenge, such as a CrR 7.8(b) motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Becker“the first three sentences of RCW 10.73.140 clearly pertain to cases where `a person has previously filed a petition for personal restraint,' which Mr. Bailey has not. They are therefore inapplicable here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Becker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.