Gear v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
1846
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2019
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Story v. Elliot · Lutz v. Linthicum · John Simonton v. Samuel Winter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The party is entitled to such damages as he may have reasonably sustained by being deprived of the profits of the work he was engaged at when the injunction was served. . . . The damages are to be estimated, with reference to his business and profits at the time of the service of the writ . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ll a party could claim, under any circumstances, would be the fees and expenses incident to the injunction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bank One v. Koch“the attorney's fees paid are not a legal charge in the assessment of damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bank One v. Koch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.