Mott v. Meach

¶1Judgment — Motion insufficient. The promise is laid to have been made within three years before the bringing of the *187action: besides tlie jury have found the promise: and it is no reason for arresting a verdict, that the jury have found it without sufficient evidence in the opinion of the court, for they are judges of the evidence. Same point adjudged at Hew Haven this circuit, in the case of Smith v. Bradly; Kirby’s Rep. 61, Woodruff v. Whittlesey.