¶1Upon a hearing on the merits, the court found the facts as laid in the petition, and decreed that said Clark, and wife pay to the petitioner, said £10, and the interest from the time cf his performing said work, upon the ground of the original agreement, and the fraud in the administrators, on refusing to discount it.
1 Root 229
Rose v. Clark
Decided September 15, 1790
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1790-09-15
<p>The court will decree an offset against an administrator of an insolvent estate, although the claim has not been exhibited and allowed by the commissioners, on the ground of fraud.</p>
Decided 1790-09-15