¶1In a qui tam prosecution for an assault and battery committed upon the wife, it was determined, that depositions taken out of court pursuant to the statute, are admissible in actions of qui tarn. Also determined, that depositions taken in this state within twenty miles of the adverse party, who lives out of the state, are not legally taken, unless notice is given. Whiting and Frisbie v. Jewet, Kirby’s Rep. 1.
1 Root 307
Moses v. Gunn
Decided August 15, 1791
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1791-08-15
<p>Depositions admissible in qui tarn prosecutions.</p> <p>Depositions taken out of the state within twenty miles of the adverse party, notice must be given.</p>
Cited in Bouvier (1839)’s definition of “Writing”
Decided 1791-08-15