¶1Judgment — That tbe declaration is sufficient. Tbe averment is direct and positive that tbe defendant was indebted for money bad and received for tbe plaintiff’s use, wbicb is all tbat was necessary. See Lawrence v. Clark, New Haven tbis circuit, and tbe plaintiff’s mentioning of whom tbe money was received is for tbe defendant’s advantage.
1 Root 372
Hurd v. Hall
Decided January 15, 1792
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1792-01-15
<p>In, an action of indebitatus assumpsit, the plaintiff's mentioning in Lis declaration of whom the money was received, for which the defendant was indebted, does not vitiate the declaration.</p>
Decided 1792-01-15