¶1Judgment —■ That the declaration is sufficient, it contains ■substantially a good consideration; that is, forbearance and stopping said suits by attachment: a clear and certain promise, *458viz. that said HaLlet’s note should uot be put in suit until the then next winter; and a breach by putting it in suit on the 1st of July after; all the rest being surplusage might better haye been omitted, and may well be rejected.
1 Root 456
Holbrook v. Judd
Decided August 15, 1792
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1792-08-15
Action of the case; declaring, that on the 5th of March, A. D. 1190, he took out two writs of attachment against the defendant, one on a note for £60, and one on book for £100, both returnable to the County Court on the fourth Tuesday of said March; which were served by attaching the defendant’s body; that the said Judd then having in Iris hands a note upon tli,e plaintiff in favor of Joseph Hallet, for £118 11s. York money, as attorney to said Hallet, applied to the…
Decided 1792-08-15