¶1The plea in abatement was judged to be sufficient, upon the ground that there were no parties before this court, but those who were parties to the writ of error; that there was no cause here but that which was brought up by the writ of *497error and reversed; that the Baldwins were not parties to the-writ of error, nor was the canse as it respected them, brought up by the writ of error.
1 Root 496
Nichols v. Baldwin
Decided January 15, 1793
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1793-01-15
<p>Wliere there are several defendants In a prosecution, and several judgments in the County Court, part of whom bring a writ of error and have the judgments reversed as to them; and the plaintiff enters his original cause, the defendants who were not-parties to- the writ of error, are not before the court.</p>
Decided 1793-01-15