¶1In ordinary cases tbe writing charged to be a forgery, must be produced in court, before any evidence can be admitted concerning tbe facts. The attorney for tbe state not being able to produce tbe writing entered a nol. pros. See State v. Osborn, New Haven, January Term, A. D. 1790.
1 Root 534
State v. Blodget
Decided July 1, 1793
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1793-07-01
<p>On an information for a forgery, the person in whose name it is charged to he done, cannot he a witness.</p> <p>Ordinarily, the writing is to he produced before the evidence is taken to the forgery.</p>
Decided 1793-07-01