¶1Before the counsel had gone through the argument, upon some suggestions from the court, the plaintiff withdrew his action. By the rules and regulations of the United States, money taken from their loan officer in this manner would not justify him in an account with their treasurer — besides it would involve the defendant in perpetual difficulty and disputes.
1 Root 551
Spalding v. Imlay
Decided March 15, 1793
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1793-03-15
<p>A foreign attachment will not hold against the loan officer of the United States, or other public officer.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1883
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1793-03-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →