¶1Judgment — That there is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of; without deciding whether Price had right to enter at the adjourned court for affirmance of judgment or not, for the replevin bond came in lieu of the property, and the action of trespass in the replevin was determined against the plaintiff; and although he appealed, yet he failed to prosecute the appeal — he therefore is liable upon the bond.
1 Root 56
Webster v. Price
Decided September 15, 1773
Connecticut Superior Court · decided 1773-09-15
Writ of Error. Price took Webster’s sheep' damage feasant and .impounded them; Webster replevied them, and charged Price in trespass for the taking; the justice gave judgment in favor of Price upon the replevin, and that Webster should pay the damage, or return the sheep; Webster appeals to the County Court, but did not prosecute his appeal; Price took out the copies and entered them in the adjourned court and had the judgment of the justice affirmed, and then brings a scire…
Decided 1773-09-15