¶1Judgment- — -That the reply of the plaintiff is sufficient and for the plaintiff to recover; for that said note was given in the night season preceding the Sabbath, when there is no law *99which expressly forbids it, or that declares such note to be void — and in this particular case, it appeared to be an interference to prevent the imprisonment of the brother.
1 Root 98
Carpenter v. Crane
Decided March 15, 1785
Connecticut Superior Court · decided 1785-03-15
ActioN on a note, dated the 29th of December. The defendant plead in bar, that said note was executed on the 30th ■of December which was Sunday or Lord’s day, and not on the 29th of said December the day it bears date.
Decided 1785-03-15