Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Silv. Ct. App. 521

Forstmann v. Schulting

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1887

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1887-10-25

<p>Appeal. Time.—A notice of an order and its entry is ineffectual to limit the time of appeal, unless it shows by indorsement or otherwise the office address or place of business of the attorney serving it.</p>

Relies on Kelly v. . Sheehan

Decided 1887-10-25

Memoranda.

¶1The notice of the order and its entry did

¶2not show by indorsement or otherwise the office address or place of business of the attorney serving it, and was therefore ineffectual to limit the time of appeal. Kelly v. Sheehan, 76 N. Y. 325; Bockes v. Hathorn, 78 id. 222.

¶3The motion to dismiss the appeal should therefore be denied, but without costs.

/1/silvctapp/521 · .json · Public domain