¶1Held,
¶2“ That as the power of attorney contained no authority to make such a mortgage as that under which the plaintiff claimed, the decisions of the Circuit Court on the points above .«laird were right.
¶3Judgment affirmed, &e.
1 Smith & H. 170
Reeves v. Baldwin
Decided November 15, 1848
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1848-11-15
This was an action of replevin brought by the appellants, to r-cover a quantity of store goods from the possession of the appelh There were three pleas upon which issues were taken, one of which denied the ownership of the appellants and asserted ownership ini the appellee. Trial, and judgment for the defendant.
Decided 1848-11-15