¶1— “We understand the evidence as showing the subscribing witnesses to have been, for years, residents of Pennsylvania, and as being still residents of that State at the date of the latest intelligence of them. It is not shown that they ever had a residence elsewhere. We think the presumption was raised that they were still residents of Pennsylvania, and that a prima facia case for proof of the hand-writing was made.”
¶2Judgment ctffrmed, &c.