Leaman v. Rauschkolb’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 1982
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews Bros. v. Bernius · Boisseau v. Vallon & Jordano, Inc. · Guy L. Deano, Inc. v. Michel · Dauterive v. West India Transportation Corp. · Barry v. Guiffria
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * that the vendor is not responsible for a commission in the event the sale is not consummated unless (1) it appears that he, the vendor, was at fault in that he refused to convey the title to the purchaser without cause or (2) unless he is unable to consummate it because his title, at the time he agreed to sell, was not marketable. * * *”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * The broker, in such a case, in the absence of notice to the contrary, has the right to act upon the assumption that his principal has a marketable title. * * *”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Doll v. Russo · Cotter v. Figaro“A real estate agent employed to sell property is entitled to a commission when he has secured a purchaser ready, able and willing to buy on vendor's terms, and has right to assume that his principal has marketable title, and when he finds an acceptable purchaser, his obligation has been fulfilled even though sale is never consummated because of principal's fault or inability to furnish title free from defect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cotter v. Figaro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.