1 So. 3d 1169 - Pratt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Brockett v. Spokane Arcades Inc · 829 So. 2d 901 - Swett v. State · Straight v. State · 570 So. 2d 925 - Czubak v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the circumstances of this case, these earlier incidents of violence do nothing more than demonstrate his propensity for violence with his family members. Neither party did anything to make motive or intent significant to any contested fact. No one suggested any factual issue as to a specific reason for battering the two women. Nor did he claim that his actions were by mistake. Motive, intent and mistake were simply not made pertinent issues in the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.