Abreu-Gutierrez v. James’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Godinez v. Moran · 494 So. 2d 969 - Muhammad v. State · 688 So. 2d 901 - Hill v. State · 773 So. 2d 1065 - Holland v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Should the trial court find that there is not a substantial probability that the petitioner will attain competency in the foreseeable future, the trial court shall release the petitioner under appropriate conditions pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.212(d) if the State does not initiate involuntary civil commitment proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““[a] defendant who has been found incompetent to proceed is presumed to remain incompetent to proceed until adjudicated competent by the court. The court must hold a hearing and enter an order finding that the defendant is competent before proceedings may resume.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. MacAluso v. State“[t]here is a substantial probability that the mental illness causing the defendant's incompetence will respond to treatment and the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCray v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.